https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #30 from Mark Thomas ---
I prefer the old versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #29 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32814
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32814&action=edit
Authenticate pdf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #28 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32813
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32813&action=edit
request process pdf version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #27 from Stephen Chen ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #26)
> These have been added to the documentation for trunk (9.0.x), 8.0.x (for
> 8.0.24 onwards) and 7.0.x (for 7.0.63 onwards).
>
> Many thanks for all your hard wor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32418|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32417|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #25 from Stephen Chen ---
Hello Mark,
Good to hear from you again, for the request process diagram, that was a typo,
andfixed now.
for the authenticate diagram, revised with you nice suggestions, please have a
look and review, tha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #24 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32752
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32752&action=edit
authenticate v5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #23 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32751
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32751&action=edit
request process V5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #22 from Mark Thomas ---
The authentication diagram also looks good. I do have a few more comments on
this.
registerAuthSuccess() is specific to the LockOutRealm. It would be worth
showing this Realm and the 'real' Realm (e.g. User
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #21 from Mark Thomas ---
The request processing diagram looks really good. There is one issue that needs
fixing before we can use it. At the end of the chain Servlet.service() is
called from ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(), not
Ap
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32369|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32368|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32344|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32237|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32329|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32345|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32236|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #20 from Stephen Chen ---
Mark, any update ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #19 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32418
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32418&action=edit
add missed methods
authentication diagram V4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #18 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32417
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32417&action=edit
add missed methods
Request process V4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas ---
Looking better. Some of the method calls are missing method names which makes
it hard to review and less useful to the reader.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #16 from Stephen Chen ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #13)
> Broadly it looks OK but the detail around the Pipelines isn't right. Calls
> to getFirst() are missing and some method names shown don't exist. Also
> method
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #15 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32369
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32369&action=edit
Revised(V3) authenticate process according to Mark's comment
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #14 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32368
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32368&action=edit
Revised(V3) request process according to Mark's comment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ---
Broadly it looks OK but the detail around the Pipelines isn't right. Calls to
getFirst() are missing and some method names shown don't exist. Also methods
are being called on the wrong objects (e.g. getH
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #12 from Stephen Chen ---
Hi Mark, please help to review the revised&advise request process and
Authenticator&Realm diagrams, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #11 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32345
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32345&action=edit
authenticate and realm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32344
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32344&action=edit
request process(revised)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Chen ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #8)
> The calls prior to CoyoteAdapter don't look right. Specifically, there is no
> Http11Processor and no SocketProcessor. After that things look OK. I do
> wonder
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ---
The calls prior to CoyoteAdapter don't look right. Specifically, there is no
Http11Processor and no SocketProcessor. After that things look OK. I do wonder
if it would be more useful with an Authenticator
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #7 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32329
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32329&action=edit
Tomcat 7.0 request process flow
Hi Mark, please check the drafted request reprocess diagram, since t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Mark
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
You are part of community too. No-one else has stepped up to do this so if you
want to fix these diagrams go for it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Chen ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> Yes, those diagrams are out of date.
>
> The problem is bigger than you have identified. Page 2 is completely wrong.
> The call sequence is very different.
H
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32237
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32237&action=edit
Page 1 step
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Chen ---
Created attachment 32236
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32236&action=edit
Page 2 step
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
39 matches
Mail list logo
