https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #3)
> I think there is a legitimate use case here.
I disagree. The connectors already have a unique name and I have no desire to
add unecessary code to provi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
I think there is a legitimate use case here.
The "name" shouldn't override the existing JMX name... just add another
property that can be used to locate the connector, even if you have to grab th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
--- Comment #2 from Jens Borgland ---
Well, yes that uniquely identifies the connector but since both those
attributes may be set at will by the administrator when deploying the
application they cannot be used to identify which connector is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
