https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #9 from Marek Jagielski ---
Hi,
Can you give any feedback on this issue? I need to take a decision to move my
project forward. I want to know if I will stay with tomcat implementation of
websocket client or look for something el
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #8 from Maciej Lypik ---
Sorry for commenting so late. I've fixed the logic and added description to
websocket-howto so it should be OK now.
I was also looking for a better solution to this problem. I checked Tyrus and
it also
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Maciej Lypik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31059|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
I haven't looked at the Websocket client code, but if it's using
HttpsURLConnection (which is a big IF) to negotiate the initial connection,
it's trivial to re-configure it using the standard API.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
It is OK for me, but here are two minor glitches
1. Wasted work.
> SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance("TLS");
Such getInstance() calls are usually slow. It'd be better to skip it if
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #4 from Maciej Lypik ---
I'm wondering if I could get any feedback on this patch. I'd like for it to be
integrated, as it is the only feasible solution to my problem.
I hate to push this myself, but with time it's becoming a bl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Lypik ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2)
> (In reply to Marek Jagielski from comment #1)
> > This patch would be useful also for those who cope with self-signed
> > certificates for test purpose
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Marek Jagielski from comment #1)
> This patch would be useful also for those who cope with self-signed
> certificates for test purposes.
I'm just curious how this would help with sel
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #1 from Marek Jagielski ---
Hello,
What is the chance to have this patch integrated into trunk? I want to avoid
keeping my fork of tomcat that is only for client code.
This patch would be useful also for those who cope with sel
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Marek Jagielski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marek.jagiel...@gmail.com
--
Yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
