https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
Severity|no
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #12 from Milo Hyson ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #11)
> I'm sorry for launching a discussion in BZ. This really belongs on the
> users' list. I'd be happy to expand upon my assertions there.
Please do. I'd
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Milo Hyson from comment #10)
> I came across that same article when I Googled the issue. The problem is it
> seems to be describing generally bad practices that are not specific to t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #10 from Milo Hyson ---
I came across that same article when I Googled the issue. The problem is it
seems to be describing generally bad practices that are not specific to the use
of relative URLs.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #9 from Chuck Caldarale ---
(In reply to Milo Hyson from comment #8)
> Maybe I've just been lucky, but I've been using relative links in
> applications for years with no issue. Can you elaborate on these bad ways?
Here's a star
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #8 from Milo Hyson ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #7)
> Relative links fail in all sorts of bad ways ...
Maybe I've just been lucky, but I've been using relative links in applications
for years with no issue.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Milo Hyson from comment #4)
> As a general rule, developers should NOT be using request.getContextPath() as
> you suggest.
I disagree. Relative links fail in all sorts of bad ways,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #6 from Milo Hyson ---
Cookies and redirects are easy with the directives provided by mod_proxy. At
issue is HTML content. I see no reason why an application should, as a matter
of general practice, bake the context-path into in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
The Manager app is certainly not a model application in many respects but it
does get the handling of the context path right.
Consider session cookies. The application is required to set the cookie path.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #4 from Milo Hyson ---
Having reviewed the source I think I see the problem. As a general rule,
developers should NOT be using request.getContextPath() as you suggest. That
just binds application content to a deployment-time con
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
The developer is doing exactly what they should do - using
request.getContextPath() to correctly construct the URL.
The breakage occurs in the proxy because the proxy is changing the path and the
applica
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #2 from Milo Hyson ---
Why is it the admin's responsibility? The developer initiated the mess by
making a faulty assumption.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
13 matches
Mail list logo
