[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-07-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas --- I see what you mean. Fair enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #13 from Alexey Noskov --- It's because I found no way to specify bind address when using SslRMIServerSocketFactory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas --- Overall patch looks OK. One questions: Why are SSL and rmiBindAddress mutually exclusive? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ---

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #11 from Alexey Noskov --- Are there other areas in which this patch should be improved? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Alexey Noskov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30321|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Noskov --- Yes, I already found how it's used. I'll make documentation and i18n changes in nearest days. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7) > The patch needs to include the associated documentation changes. It would > also be nice if it used StringManager for i18n. Alexey, if you'd care to ma

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas --- The patch needs to include the associated documentation changes. It would also be nice if it used StringManager for i18n. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #6 from Alexey Noskov --- Created attachment 30321 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30321&action=edit Patch to provider bind rmi bind address setup ability (updated, 2) Yes, with IllegalStateException

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Alexey Noskov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30320|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz --- Hmm... I thought sure that LifecycleListeners could throw checked exceptions, but it seems they can't. I'm still not happy with this not failing-fast. What happens if you throw an IllegalStateExc

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #4 from Alexey Noskov --- Well. But then which exception should be thrown here? Or there is other preferred way to fail configuring the connector? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz --- I think conflicting settings should actually fail to configure the connector, rather than playing favorites. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Noskov --- Created attachment 30320 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30320&action=edit Patch to provider bind rmi bind address setup ability (updated) Just adjusted patch: added else cla

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Alexey Noskov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30319|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz --- I think the code starting at line 217 should probably be an "else" of this if clause: if (rmiSSL) { csf = new SslRMIClientSocketFactory(); ssf = new Ss

[Bug 55017] Ability to configure RMI bind address

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Alexey Noskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexey.nos...@gmail.com -- You ar