https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
Brian Burch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 31/03/2013 10:27, Brian Burch wrote:
On 22/03/13 01:11, Brian Burch wrote:
I'll keep this enhancement open until I've had time to think properly...
although your new Basic "parser" has returned to BasicAuthenticator,
there might still be some merit in moving it to HttpParser and keeping
my p
On 22/03/13 01:11, Brian Burch wrote:
I'll keep this enhancement open until I've had time to think properly...
although your new Basic "parser" has returned to BasicAuthenticator,
there might still be some merit in moving it to HttpParser and keeping
my proposed test suite, especially now you ha
On 21/03/13 09:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2013-03-21 10:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'm sorry you feel that your efforts have been wasted. My intention was
to get you a robust Base64 implementation to work with for the other
improvements you had in mind for BASIC auth. If there are other
improv
On 21/03/13 09:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/03/2013 07:56, Brian Burch wrote:
On 20/03/13 10:17, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
Sorry I could not reply more quickly, Mark, but I am currently in
Australia and I am probably asleep while you a
On 2013-03-21 10:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'm sorry you feel that your efforts have been wasted. My intention was
to get you a robust Base64 implementation to work with for the other
improvements you had in mind for BASIC auth. If there are other
improvements you have in mind for BASIC auth the
On 21/03/2013 07:56, Brian Burch wrote:
> On 20/03/13 10:17, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
>
> Sorry I could not reply more quickly, Mark, but I am currently in
> Australia and I am probably asleep while you are working.
Not a problem. One
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
--- Comment #3 from Julian Reschke ---
You may want to have a look at the the cases at:
http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc/httpauth/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
On 20/03/13 10:17, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
Sorry I could not reply more quickly, Mark, but I am currently in
Australia and I am probably asleep while you are working.
Judging by the flurry of activity in this area, I conclude my cha
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
I've done some additional testing.
On a warmed up system the JRE and Tomcat Base64 decoding implementations are
comparable. Tomcat does warm up faster. Without warm up on 100 iterations
(different in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Regarding your points:
1. Clarity vs efficiency is always a trade off. It depends how much efficiency
has been lost. Do you have any performance numbers?
2. I don't see a test case either. I'd rather ge
11 matches
Mail list logo
