https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
Looks good to me. The failing tests pass. I haven't done a full test run
though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #15 from Mladen Turk ---
Attrs should be fine now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas ---
Sure. Just as soon as you make those files world readable ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #13 from Mladen Turk ---
Please try with the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/1.1.27-dev-20130202/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Library |Connectors
Version|unspec
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #10 from Mladen Turk ---
Not sure what you mean by double increment. Is it?
p->set[n++] = (jlong)(fd->rtnevents);
p->set[n++] = P2J(fd->client_data);
That should be fine.
The returned array consist of pair
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hmm, reading the code it seems that a socket is member of two pollsets
> (timeouts and connections). Is this correct. Note that socket can be member
> of only one pollset and 1.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #8 from Mladen Turk ---
Hmm, reading the code it seems that a socket is member of two pollsets
(timeouts and connections). Is this correct. Note that socket can be member of
only one pollset and 1.1.26 kind of enforces that.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Hmm. There may be more to this problem than just that. I still see issues even
with a workaround for the Poll.poollset() return value problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Connectors |Library
Version|trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
I can repeat this on 64-bit Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Reproduced this issue with Native 1.1.24, but a bit different.
I was not able to reproduce the NPE, but SocketInputStream.socketRead0 in the
test hung in the same way. There were two variants:
a) n
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
> I suspect that "wrapper" is null here.
Yes, it is null. I added the following code at line 1632:
[[[
if (wrapper==null) throw new NullPointerException("wrapper is null, n: " + n +
", rv: "+rv+
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 29912
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29912&action=edit
thread_dump_2013-02-01.txt
Thread dump, taken with jvisualvm during the 15-minutes pause
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54513
--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 29911
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29911&action=edit
TEST-org.apache.catalina.loader.TestVirtualContext.APR.txt
JUnit test result file
--
You are
16 matches
Mail list logo
