https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Sheldon Shao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||54314
--
You are receiving this ma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Sheldon Shao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29711|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
--- Comment #6 from Sheldon Shao ---
Test case has been included.
Thanks
(In reply to comment #1)
> The JSTL spec does indeed require that null is treated like an empty
> collection.
>
> The patch does not include a test case.
--
You ar
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
--- Comment #5 from Sheldon Shao ---
Created attachment 29711
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29711&action=edit
Helper class for testing purpose
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
--- Comment #4 from Sheldon Shao ---
Created attachment 29710
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29710&action=edit
Test case for "ForEach"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Sheldon Shao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29689|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
I think generating an "if(itemsV != null){ }" clause around the whole iteration
loop will be more effective. An iterator is a temporary object that is GC'ed.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Sheldon Shao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29689|0 |1
is patch|
10 matches
Mail list logo