https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Note that I removed the extractUriElements() from within the processBody()
method.
The response body might be not HTML, and in >=90% of test cases this
information is not needed by the test.
The
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
Brian Burch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29443|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53960
--- Comment #1 from Brian Burch ---
I wondered whether my refactoring might have broken the logic associated with
processing the response body. I have reviewed my change, renamed an argument to
make it self-explanatory, and fixed a typo in
