https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component|Cluster
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #4 from F.Arnoud ---
You're right, only one access to get() for WeakReference (and brother classes).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #3 from Sebb ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I used this solution:
>
> protected void sendPing() {
> TcpFailureDetector tcpFailureDetector = failureDetector!=null ?
> failureDetector.get() : null;
> if (tcpFa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #2 from F.Arnoud ---
I used this solution:
protected void sendPing() {
TcpFailureDetector tcpFailureDetector = failureDetector!=null ?
failureDetector.get() : null;
if (tcpFailureDetector!=null) {
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
F.Arnoud changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from F.Arnoud ---
S
