https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Catalina|Catalina
Version|7.0.29
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component|C
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #12 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I personally do not like use of "{0}" in the messages for the "description"
> > field. Especially the ones for 404 and 403.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Jung ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I personally do not like use of "{0}" in the messages for the "description"
> field. Especially the ones for 404 and 403. It looks like some unrelated
> text is inserted into t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #9 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
>
> I agree with Mark here.
> The change in r1348762 is in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
I agree with Mark here.
The change in r1348762 is in the place where ErrorReportValve prepares HTML
text of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 28921
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28921&action=edit
Screen shot from Tomcat trunk
The same with Tomcat trunk after implementing the feature.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 28920
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28920&action=edit
Screen shot from Tomcat 7.0.27
Just a screen shot, for comparison. It is before implementing t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Then you have already replaced / modified the error report valve and you won't
see this change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
This might end up being a security problem, depending on what information is in
the exception message. Can we make this a non-default
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.28 onwards.
>
> Proposed for 6.0.x
>
> Notes:
> 1. The message from the Throwable was displayed in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
Fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.28 onwards.
Proposed for 6.0.x
Notes:
1. The message from the Throwable was displayed in the stack trace.
2. I modified the patch. The message from t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2012-04-13 09:34:41 UTC
---
This change could also be applied to Tomcat 7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
15 matches
Mail list logo
