[Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2021-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 poovensathi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||poovensathi...@gmail.com --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2010-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2010-12-02 03:36:57 EST --- Please don't hijack similar but unrelated bugs. Anything added to an already resolved bug is almost certain to get ignored / lost. Please create a new Enhancement request for the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2010-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 --- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Grzybek 2010-12-02 02:42:46 EST --- Here's my attempt to integrate Tomcat with SLF4J + Logback from the very beginning (Catalina.main()): https://github.com/grgrzybek/tomcat-slf4j-logback It works for me and c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2010-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2010-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz 2010-11-09 17:29:23 EST --- Created an attachment (id=26274) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26274) Sample log4j configuration that matches default java.util.logging config

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50242] Sample log4j configuration does not match default JULI-based configuration

2010-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Mark