[Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods [PATCH?]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods [PATCH?]

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Jung --- I agree it would be nice if we could disable leak detection in case the JVM shuts down. This is a frequent case and in that case the leaks don't matter. The logs in this case only raise awareness for the

[Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods [PATCH?]

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 Christopher Schultz changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Enhance memory leak |Enhance memory leak

[Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- First of all, the memory leak detection is not going to be disabled. For far too long Tomcat was being blamed for PermGen based OOME errors triggered by web application reloads. The leak detection code ha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #5 from Leon Rosenberg 2011-12-05 15:13:30 UTC --- a year passed, any updates on this one? ;-) Can the memory leak detection be switched off completely? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #4 from Leon Rosenberg 2010-11-02 06:35:02 EDT --- I think we should generally distinguish the different usage scenarios. For what I know, most people who use tomcat in production environment (in portals or b2c sites) do not u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #3 from Pid 2010-11-01 17:52:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What is the final purpose ? speedup the shutdown process or avoid warnings > about potential leaks when shutting down ? A bit of both, a User list discussion pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 sylvain.laur...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|trunk |7.0.2 --- Comment #2 fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 Leon Rosenberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rosenberg.l...@gmail.com -- Conf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50175] Enhance memory leak detection by selectively applying methods,

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175 --- Comment #1 from Pid 2010-10-28 17:12:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26223) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26223) Simple patch illustrating idea Adds a system property and checks for it during app undep