[Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2014-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #14 from Jackie Rosen --- *** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seen from the domain http://volichat.com Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 kwalk...@cisco.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Version|6.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas 2010-04-10 21:48:11 EDT --- This has been applied to 5.5.x and will be included in 5.5.30 onwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g.balacha...@hotmail.com ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-03-09 14:27:48 UTC --- In r920880 of trunk I added a system property to allow disabling enforcement of JSP.5.3. This is proposed for 6.0 and 5.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas 2010-03-08 21:55:43 UTC --- Agreed. TagVariableInfo should be just as acceptable for this purpose. I have fixed this in trunk and proposed it for 6.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #4 from Boris Folgmann 2010-02-08 08:29:26 UTC --- That's really bad because that worked up to 6.0.18. I can't remember any problems with such JSPs since tomcat 4 and 5. What about a compatibility switch to keep all that 3rd pa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Kris Schneider changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID -- Configure bugmail: ht

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Kris Schneider changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Kris Sc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 --- Comment #1 from Boris Folgmann 2010-02-08 07:29:50 UTC --- To make it even more clear, this works: But getProperty always fails when the bean is not created with useBean. It's not specific to . Other constructions also fail. -- C