https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69815
Bug ID: 69815
Summary: Feature request: support device bound session
credentials (DBSC)
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69814
Sammy Chan changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from Sammy Chan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69814
--- Comment #1 from Sammy Chan ---
Created attachment 40098
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40098&action=edit
demo source, app, video
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69814
Bug ID: 69814
Summary: HttpSession.isNew() may return true on an existing
session due to a race condition
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.44
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Insufficient information has been provided for the Tomcat team to provide a
definitive answer.
The change log comment explicitly states it applies only when a Writer is being
used. Your code example is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
--- Comment #4 from gnirmalkuma...@gmail.com ---
I wanted to add some more details from our application code in case it helps
narrow this down.
We use a custom GZIPFilter that buffers the response, compresses it, and then
explicitly sets the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
--- Comment #3 from gnirmalkuma...@gmail.com ---
Hi Mark, thanks for your response.
I reviewed the Tomcat 9.0.107 release notes
and noticed the following change:
Fix: Allow the default servlet to set the content length when the content
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
--- Comment #2 from David Connard ---
Can we get some kind of warning or something in the public changelog?
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/changelog.html doesn't currently note
that 9.0.109 is a bad release, and doesn'
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
David Connard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dconnar...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
R. Oosterholt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.oosterh...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Known issue with 9.0.109 and 10.1.45.
New releases are in progress / will be in progress soon that fix that. I'd
expect them to be complete early next week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
Bug ID: 69810
Summary: ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tomcat.util.concurrent.KeyedReentrantReadWr
iteLock
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.109
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69806
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Ilmalämpöpumppu Tampere |SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69805
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69806
Bug ID: 69806
Summary: Ilmalämpöpumppu Tampere
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69806
AJK Oy changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.ajk-oy.fi/ilmal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69805
AJK Oy changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.ajk-oy.fi/putki
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69805
Bug ID: 69805
Summary: Putkimies Tampere
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69801
--- Comment #2 from Martin Fúsek ---
Hi because it hapend when i reboot tomcat, whole standard output from tomcat
12:18:58.482 INFO {main} [o.a.c.h.Http11NioProtocol] : Starting
ProtocolHandler ["https-openssl-nio-8453"]
12:42:4
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69801
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
I think it would be rare for someone to want to customize the named groups
based upon the certificate itself. Sure, some certificate types narrow-down the
list of named groups available for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Yes, I would prefer Jre20Compat for consistency :)
I think merging JreCompat implementations to just the LTS versions would be
worth a discussion on the dev@ list.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #6 from Remy Maucherat ---
Mark likes precision now, so definitely Jre20Compat.
In theory I think it is better to add it to Certificate, but since some groups
are already hybrid (it means there are two expected certificates of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69803
Bug ID: 69803
Summary: HTTP/1.1 Connector Content-Length header calculation
regression causing Chrome/Edge
net::ERR_CONTENT_LENGTH_MISMATCH
Product: Tomcat 9
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
I think it makes sense to have "namedGroups" on the element,
alongside the "ciphers".
Rémy, do you think it makes more sense to add it to the ?
If we do only this bit:
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #4 from Matt Porter ---
Hey Remmy,
Apologies, I wasn't quite following. I was picturing something like this:
https://github.com/matthew-js-porter/spring-boot-named-groups-testing/tree/main/named-groups-tomcat-server
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Again, unless and until a test case is provided that demonstrates this issue,
there is nothing the Tomcat team can do.
If no test case is provided, this will get resolved as "WORKSFORME".
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802
Bug ID: 69802
Summary: optional certificateVerification with TLS 1.3 gives a
warning but it should work fine
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: 11.0.10
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
--- Comment #4 from gnirmalkuma...@gmail.com ---
We are facing the exact same issue after upgrading our base image from Tomcat
9.0.106 to 9.0.107.
Our UI pages stopped loading, and we were forced to downgrade back to 9.0.106.
The problem
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69801
Bug ID: 69801
Summary: SIGSEGV during shutdown when using tomcat-native and
certificate client auth
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.44
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
https://tls13.xargs.org/#client-hello/annotated
The client hello has info on the client supported groups, which is probably
what we need.
As a result, with TLS 1.3, it would be a good idea to use that
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #2 from Matt Porter ---
Apologies, I wasn't suggesting anything custom for Bouncy Castle's JSSE
provider, my point there is that they released a version with PQC resistant key
exchange algorithms so I think we'll se
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
Tomcat's focus is on OpenSSL (and clones) support for newer TLS features, and
(plain) JSSE for more established ones. I am not in favor of adding anything
dedicated to custom JSSE providers.
So
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800
Bug ID: 69800
Summary: Enhancement: Support for configuring TLS named groups
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69799
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69799
Bug ID: 69799
Summary: Please remove from the taglib moderator's list
Product: Taglibs
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
> I'm not sure it does. The database operations should be atomic.
+1, let's assume that then and avoid preemptively adding stuff, we'll see i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm not sure it does. The database operations should be atomic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #6 from Remy Maucherat ---
I suppose DataSourceStore needs the same addition of per key locking ? It uses
getObjectInputStream the same way as FileStore (no surprise there).
I will do the changes.
I will not update JDBCStore
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
If the requested information is not provided, this issue will be resolved as
WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69792
Bug ID: 69792
Summary: LOVE678 – Platform Hot Live Streaming Terpanas Di
Indonesia
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I've added a test case for this to main (12.0.x). I haven't looked at the
proposed solution yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dev@tomcat.apache.org |b...@httpd.apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.63 |unspecified
Product|Apache httpd
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788
Bug ID: 69788
Summary: shadowdb
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|shadowdb|
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69785
Azat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69786
Bug ID: 69786
Summary: reporter:us...@company.com
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69785
Deal Toys Shop changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://dealtoys.shop
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69785
Bug ID: 69785
Summary: Custom Lucite Deal Toys & M&A Tombstones |
DealToys.shop
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Sta
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783
olivia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliviabennett0...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783
Bug ID: 69783
Summary: https://pacexgrowth.com/us-staffing-and-recruiting/
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #3 from Aaron Ogburn ---
(In reply to Aaron Ogburn from comment #2)
> https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/882 is an example with sessionid
> specific read/write locks that addresses this in my tests.
Note this fix does a s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #2 from Aaron Ogburn ---
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/882 is an example with sessionid specific
read/write locks that addresses this in my tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
--- Comment #1 from Aaron Ogburn ---
Created attachment 40082
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40082&action=edit
bz-69781-reproducer.zip
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
Bug ID: 69781
Summary: FileStore used with PersistentValve can cause
EOFException during session expiration checks and
dropped session
Product: Tomcat 10
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69780
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Severity|blocker
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69780
Bug ID: 69780
Summary: Assignee
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69778
travelsmart24 group changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Windows 10
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69778
travelsmart24 group changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://travelsmart24.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69778
Bug ID: 69778
Summary: Travelsmart24 Group of Company
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 2.0.8
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to logo from comment #25)
> Indeed I use CRL to check client certs.
>
> And so far I have only the "old" CRL functionality provided by openssl.
So it sounds like you
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #25 from logo ---
Indeed I use CRL to check client certs.
And so far I have only the "old" CRL functionality provided by openssl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
--- Comment #7 from Nirbhay ---
I have raised this bug https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
Bug ID: 69770
Summary: ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR regression in Tomcat 10.1.43
(similar to fixed Bug 69320)
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.43
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Acceligize B2B |SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
akash.pan...@acceligize.in changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69766
Bug ID: 69766
Summary: Acceligize B2B
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 2.0.7
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713
Nirbhay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69765
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69765
--- Comment #2 from Chuck Caldarale ---
The content of attachment 40078 has been deleted for the following reason:
Spam
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69765
--- Comment #1 from exploit ---
Comment on attachment 40078
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40078
x
ESX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69765
Bug ID: 69765
Summary: x
Product: Tomcat Connectors
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Please don't report potential security issues to the public bug tracker.
Instructions for correctly reporting security vulnerabilities can be found at:
https://tomcat.apache.org/security.html
The T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Jeppe Weikop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Bug ID: 69762
Summary: Integer overflow in HPACK integer decoding
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.107
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167
--- Comment #2 from Mariah Carey ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Bugzilla is not a support forum. Please direct you question to the Tomcat
> users mailing list.
>
> https://yoplay.io https://tomcat.apache.org/lists
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #24 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to logo from comment #22)
> @Chris: while this may be true for LE, I haven't read anything about
> terminating OCSP in browsers or any other CA.
In July 2023, the CAB forum
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #23 from logo ---
Oh, i just recognized that for client certs I do need the CRLs anyway as there
is no OCSP for client auth.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #22 from logo ---
@Chris: while this may be true for LE, I haven't read anything about
terminating OCSP in browsers or any other CA.
For myself I use OCSP for my internal CA (SmallStep) and I'm far more
comfortable with
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
--- Comment #2 from Min Li <15135113...@163.com> ---
Thanks for your kindly reply.I found this issue caused by the code written by
one of my colleague. I has fixed it.Thanks for your reply again.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Bug ID: 69758
Summary: java.lang.NullPointerException
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #5)
>
> > This seems like a reasonable "secure by default" hardening maneuver.
>
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
--- Comment #7 from Don't show my email ---
To make my POV clear:
This is foolish, but an expression of will:
appBase="/usr/java/apache-tomcat-9.0.106/conf"
appBase="/usr/java/apache-tomcat-9.0.106/"
appBase=&qu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #5)
> This seems like a reasonable "secure by default" hardening maneuver.
Tomcat is already secure by default in this case. The default is &q
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> I might be persuaded to support logging a waring if appBase == $CATALINA_BASE
I would highly recommend that we should do this. It's almost unt
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69748
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
1 - 100 of 35175 matches
Mail list logo