https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
--- Comment #3 from Chen Jp ---
Update PR#862, URL-Rewriting is the last alternative option for Session
Tracking Mode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
--- Comment #2 from Chen Jp ---
Per servlet spec says:
"URL rewriting should not be used as a session tracking mechanism where cookies
or SSL sessions are supported and suitable."
Before forward jsessionid, we need determine wheth
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
This issue has been open for over a month waiting for additional information.
With out that information, this issue will eventually be resolved as
WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69702
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69702
Bug ID: 69702
Summary: Sometime return 404 for normal request when using
HTTP2
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.100
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69700
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Jareš ---
I can agree that once OutOfMemory happens, the JDK is not in a good shape. But
it should lead to a crash of the application. In this case, it just disables
the Tomcat and process it still up. It is like a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69700
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69700
Bug ID: 69700
Summary: Thread pool stops working when memory resources are
exceed and new thread is needed
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.40
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
Bug ID: 69699
Summary: Rewrite redirection forget SessionID path parameter
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: 11.0.6
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690
--- Comment #4 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
Ok. I saw commit... Many thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690
--- Comment #3 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
Hi
How was this fixed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69696
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69696
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
--- Comment #3 from injae.kim@gmail.com ---
I also think refactoring by enum here looks much better for code readability :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69696
Bug ID: 69696
Summary: Unexpected jsp page result if inner class changed to
compilation error
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: 11.0.6
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69695
Bug ID: 69695
Summary: Pte certificate without exam
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 2.0.7
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694
Bug ID: 69694
Summary: Manager Deploy does not check return value of war copy
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.102
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
--- Comment #2 from johnpark ---
Only the comments using AI. Please refer to them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
Bug ID: 69693
Summary: Improve readability and type safety by changing
parsingRequestLinePhase to an enum in
Http11InputBuffer
Product: Tomcat 11
Version
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690
--- Comment #1 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
See
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/856
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Correct. That is the way the Servlet specification is designed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69690
Bug ID: 69690
Summary: allowsto plug in some ProgressListener on multipart
file upload processing
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: 11.0.6
Hardware: All
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
--- Comment #4 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
Thanks for your answer. Assume the following.
- In some application you have a chain of filters the last one being Wicket
(filer or as a Servlet)
- One of those filters calls getParameter
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
--- Comment #2 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
https://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=174715822910583&w=2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
--- Comment #1 from Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro ---
See
https://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=174715822910583&w=2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69689
Bug ID: 69689
Summary: user no longer have the ability to process multipart
by themselves
Product: Tomcat 11
Version: 11.0.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #8 from felixzhang0...@gmail.com ---
Okay,that's great, thanks !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #7 from Chuck Caldarale ---
No, you only need to make create the PR for one branch (preferably main); the
committers will take care of merging it into the other active branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #6 from felixzhang0...@gmail.com ---
Hi Christopher Schultz
If we have make change for main branch only, then for teams who are still using
tomcat 9.x or 10.x, will not see the new change, right ?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #4 from felixzhang0...@gmail.com ---
Hi team
I have just raised PRs.
main
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/850/files
9.0.x
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/851
10.1.x
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/852
11.0.x
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29162
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://www.youtube.com/@Ab |
|basRahi001
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29162
--- Comment #2 from fairynorth ---
https://www.youtube.com/@AbbasRahi001
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29162
fairynorth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://nexus.pslib.cz/~logi |https://www.youtube.com/@Ab
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #3 from johnpark ---
Hi felixzhang0818, are you still planning to submit a PR for BZ-69675? If not,
I'd be happy to prepare one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #2 from felixzhang0...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> This seems like a good candidate for a user-contributed patch/PR.
>
> Would you care to prepare one and we'll apply it?
Yes,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
This seems like a good candidate for a user-contributed patch/PR.
Would you care to prepare one and we'll apply it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
Bug ID: 69675
Summary: Please include threadName in WebappClassLoaderBase
clearReferencesThreads log content
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.98
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56546
felixzhang0...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felixzhang0...@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69674
Bug ID: 69674
Summary: Poptropica: A Virtual World of Adventure, Learning,
and Imagination
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.36
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69670
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|360 Land Surveying Ltd. |SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69670
360 Land Surveying Ltd. <360landsurveyinglt...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69670
Bug ID: 69670
Summary: 360 Land Surveying Ltd.
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #9 from John Engebretson ---
Yep, we can easily detect it from Generator.java via something like:
if (!"true".equals(ctxt.getOptions().getJspConfig().getErrorOnELNotFound()) {
And I have a String-based implement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68876
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #11 from Isaac Khalil ---
Im confused.
I need to use a programmatic authentication so how do I change it then?
Why is it different behaviour when accessing / vs /index.jsp
All URL's work except /
This looks like an ob
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Isaac Khalil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #9 from Isaac Khalil ---
Im confused.
I need to use a programmatic authentication so how do I change it then?
Why is it different behaviour when accessing / vs /index.jsp
All URL's work except /
This looks like an ob
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #8 from John Engebretson ---
Gotcha, thanks - in #1 equivalence can be explicitly changed, and in #2 we
could interfere with side effects that a particular application added. More
cases may follow, but as you noted, they would
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
It isn't always true but the cases where it isn't true may be detectable and/or
rare enough that it is still worth doing.
I think the cases are
1. errorOnELNotFound page directive set to true
2. A
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #6 from John Engebretson ---
Thanks Mark! I didn't follow all of that, but is there a case where this:
${not empty bean && not empty bean.property}
cannot safely be translated to:
${not empty bean.property}
for li
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Tx. That helps. I've obviously been spending too much time with the Jakarta EL
spec. Pure EL will throw exceptions for those. I'd forgotten about the null
handling implemented in Jakarta P
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #7 from Isaac Khalil ---
BTW we did not have this problem in 9.0.45 and only became a issue when we
upgraded to 9.0.102
Then I upgraded to 10.1.40 thinking it was only an issue in v9 but surprised to
find it still there
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
It looks like something from a previous request is retaining a reference to the
request object and continuing to use it after request processing has completed.
That would be an application bug.
You might
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
--- Comment #2 from msiu...@atlassian.com ---
This is the part that I don't fully understand neither, as I didn't dig into
Tomcat code before. My only idea was that the Request object could be reused
causing this behaviour. I'm n
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #6 from Isaac Khalil ---
If I use the msi installer for windows it works fine
If I use the tar.gz below
https://dlcdn.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.40/bin/apache-tomcat-10.1.40.tar.gz
I can reproduce it in Windows under WSL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #5 from Isaac Khalil ---
the Tomcat I am using on my server is
https://dlcdn.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.40/bin/apache-tomcat-10.1.40.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #4 from Isaac Khalil ---
so if you do the above then test by
https://.../test
shows
Session Timeout=120
https://.../test/index.jsp
shows
Session Timeout=1800
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Isaac Khalil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Isaac Khalil
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #2 from Isaac Khalil ---
Created attachment 40031
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40031&action=edit
context files
attached is context files to unzip under webapps
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
Bug ID: 69665
Summary: getRequestURI() mutates MessageBytes state
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.86
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
--- Comment #20 from Ronny Perinke ---
To me, it sounds like it's time to say goodbye to NIO2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
Sebastian Lövdahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Lövdahl ---
PR: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/848
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
Bug ID: 69664
Summary: Mime type for video/mp2t is missing in default web.xml
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69663
Bug ID: 69663
Summary: OPG Mobility – Reliable EV Charging Solutions for
Homes and Businesses
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.104
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662
Bug ID: 69662
Summary: NamingContext does not include name when throwing
NamingException
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.39
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #4 from John Engebretson ---
Created attachment 40030
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40030&action=edit
Unit test demonstrating current null behavior
Certainly - demonstration JSP attached.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
vansh Pradeep sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bloomagency.in/webs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
Bug ID: 69661
Summary: "Bloom Digital Marketing Agency delivers innovative
web design, SEO, and social media strategies for
business growth and success."
Produ
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
That null handling behaviour isn't what I'd expect. I'd expect some exceptions.
Can you create a simple JSP that demonstrates the null handling you are seeing?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #2 from John Engebretson ---
Thanks Christopher! Very helpful.
> How much mileage could you get out of a simple regex-style replacement that
> looks for very specific things like this?
I would get excellent mileage, althou
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
An optimizing compiler won't add much because it can't really prove those
things are true unless we teach it, which is probably not worth it. Even the
JIT probably isn't able to figur
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
--- Comment #19 from Remy Maucherat ---
NIO2 is very clean, so initially when it was released it was better than NIO,
which felt abandoned.
Since then, roughly staring with Java 11, the following happened:
- NIO got fixes and significant
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
Bug ID: 69659
Summary: Automatic JSP EL optimization
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.98
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
--- Comment #18 from Mark Thomas ---
NIO is poller based.
NIO2 is callback based.
Performance wise they should be pretty much identical.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631
--- Comment #17 from Ronny Perinke ---
We have cross-checked with HTTP and NIO to see if they are also affected.
http-nio2 and https-openssl-nio are _not_ affected, only https-openssl-nio2.
What are the effective differences between NIO and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
--- Comment #18 from John Engebretson ---
*** Bug 65124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65124
John Engebretson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
John Engebretson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
--- Comment #17 from John Engebretson ---
Thanks Mark!
Backports completed, resolving. Expansion to additional tags may come later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Bug ID: 69657
Summary: session timeout not set when accessing / and its
redirected to index.jsp
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.40
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
--- Comment #8 from Thomas ---
Please see the attached screenshot again. I think the root cause is that the
length of org.apache.coyote.http2.Http2 Protocol#recycledRequestsAndResponses
gradually increases when the upgrade request comes. In
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas from comment #6)
> In my opinion, the fix will like this:
> https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/844
That is not the fix for this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
--- Comment #6 from Thomas ---
In my opinion, the fix will like this:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/844
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
--- Comment #5 from Thomas ---
Can you show me the patches that resolved this issue? Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 34983 matches
Mail list logo
