Sorry I missed all of these things. Is there a checkstyle or eclipse
config somewhere that I can use to make sure the next batch is clean?
Phil
On 10/25/19 11:12 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 7.
On 10/16/19 7:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2019 00:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
How about adding the DBCP unit tests to the source tree? I suspect some
would have failed due to this change. If others think this is a good
idea, I could take a stab at genericising them and creating a PR to
On 10/16/19 7:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/10/2019 00:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
How about adding the DBCP unit tests to the source tree? I suspect some
would have failed due to this change. If others think this is a good
idea, I could take a stab at genericising them and creating a PR to
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833
Phil Steitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from Phil Steitz ---
This is a regression
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I started to work on cleaning up the DBCP generics warnings in 7.0.x before I
> remembered what "fun" it was when I did this for DBCP2. While some of it is
> straight-forward, some of it requires some refactoring. From memory, t
On 12/17/11 11:42 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>>>
On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Ok then interprete my words as: now you can use a staging repository.
> This way, art
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 05:19, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/16/11 12:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
>>> 1. scp+rsync via pe
On 12/16/11 12:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
> 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
> 2. Nexus
>
> Personally, my only requirements are:
> a) that the JARs reach Maven Central
> b) publishing is as simple as running a single script
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/11/2010 21:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > With this change to createRandom it is not clear to me what the value of
> the
> > reseeding is when the SecureRandom is not user-supplied.
>
> Maybe not a huge amount.
With this change to createRandom it is not clear to me what the value of the
reseeding is when the SecureRandom is not user-supplied. Maybe a crypto
expert can comment. It would speed up initialization in the default case if
the reseeding was only done for user-defined generators. Alternatively
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:41 AM, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sat Nov 27 11:41:10 2010
> New Revision: 1039657
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1039657&view=rev
> Log:
> Drop the entropy attribute. SecureRandom has a sufficiently secure
> self-seeding mechanism.
>
> Modified:
>tomc
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces (a bit late) the immediate availability
> of Apache
> Tomcat 5.5.28 stable.
>
> Apache Tomcat 5.5.28 incorporates numerous security updates and bug fixes.
> Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
> http://tomcat.apa
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
> > I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection
> > pooling - but maybe they could download it separately ? Would't be
> > easier to just download the 'official' version ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
