Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.18

+1 Stable On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.18 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.18/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCA

crlFile and SunX509 algorithm in Tomcat 7.0.11

I posted a request for help regarding an issue with configuration of CRL for HTTPS connector on the users list but haven't receive any insights on the matter. I am re-posting the message with summary information in hope that someone on the dev list can help. * * * Up to Tomcat 7.0.10, I used the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.4

+1 Beta On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.4 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.4/ > The svn tag is: > http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.3

+1 Beta On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.3 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.3/ > The svn tag is: > http:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.2

Looks fine on my side. [X] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.2 Beta Martin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 as beta

+1 Beta On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0/ > The svn tag is: > http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 as beta

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/06/2010 14:27, Martin Dubuc wrote: > >> I have been running RC4 for a couple of days and it seems to be fairly >> stable. I would recommend release it as 7.0.0 Beta. >> >> However, there is an issue w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 as beta

I have been running RC4 for a couple of days and it seems to be fairly stable. I would recommend release it as 7.0.0 Beta. However, there is an issue with the el. It can't deal with literals, which will be a problem for all applications using JSF converters. There was a similar issue when Tomcat 6

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 7.0.0 based on Tomcat 7.0.0-RC4

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 09/06/2010 17:49, Martin Dubuc wrote: > > I can't get the jsvc binary to build with 7.0.0 RC4 under Fedora and > CentOS. > > That would be best handled as a commons-daemon issue. I don't know > enough about co

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 7.0.0 based on Tomcat 7.0.0-RC4

I can't get the jsvc binary to build with 7.0.0 RC4 under Fedora and CentOS. Here is the output from make: (cd native; make all) make[1]: Entering directory `/root/apache-tomcat-7.0.0-RC4/bin/commons-daemon-1.0.2-native-src/unix/native' gcc -g -O2 -DOS_LINUX -DDSO_DLFCN -DCPU=\"i386\" -I/usr/jav

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? Martin On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.13

I have been using 6.0.13 for a few days. I was using 6.0.11 for some time up to then. My app was running pretty smooth with 6.0.11. I do not not if it is a coincidence or not, but since seitching to 6.0.13, I have seen a few cases of Java exceptions, all seems to be related to MySQL Connector/J co

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.13

On 5/8/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.13/ According to the release process, the 6.0.13 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable Rémy ---

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10

On 2/16/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable ---

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

On 2/5/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable --

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

+1 On 2/4/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x: 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing 3. wait 2-3 days for testing 4.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

+1 On 2/1/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ Votes ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: New 6.0.x build

+1 On 1/30/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday) > to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit > earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.8 as alpha

+1 On 1/18/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.8/ Votes ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.7

6.0.7 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 6.0 status

+1 to declare 6.0.6 beta. I am quite satisfied with its stability. Martin On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if n

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.6 as alpha

+1 On 12/15/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The vote is to release Apache Tomcat 6.0.6 as alpha. The build is located here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.6/ Votes ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-m

Turning on logging of JSF 1.2 container inside Tomcat

I have tried to turn on logging for the JSF 1.2 container inside Tomcat 6, but haven't been successful. I followed the steps outlined on Core JavaServer Faces book (p. 634), but the catalina.out file doesn't contain more traces than when logging is not turned on. I have copied the logging.propert

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.4 alpha build

+1 On 12/6/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Replacing the 6.0.3 tag, with fixes for the visible glitches: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.4/ Votes ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

TomcatNative Libarry on Fedora Core 5

Anybody been successful builidng Tomcat Native for Fedora Core 5? Is there a place where I could retrieve the RPM? I have tried to build. I had to modify the tcnative.spec file as outlined by Jonas and repackage the sources of the tomcat-native.tar.gz archive to be able to start the build process

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41091] - Issue with JSF 1.2 validation when using subviews

This bug is quite serious for developers that use JSF subviews in their applications. This bug prevents the use of any validation code in pages that use subviews. On 11/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THRO

Re: Custom Faces servlet support in Tomcat 6.0.2 (JSF 1.2)

I guess it would help to specify what kind of problem I am experiencing!!! ;-) Here is the exception stack trace that gets thrown when the controller tries to process the first JSF page: Nov 30, 2006 10:08:31 PM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log SEVERE: StandardWrapper.Throwable ja

Custom Faces servlet support in Tomcat 6.0.2 (JSF 1.2)

My Web application relies on a custom Faces servlet to handle server errors. This custom Faces servlet used to work well inside Tomcat 5.5.16 but not anymore in Tomcat 6.0.2. I do not know if this problem is a limitation of Tomcat 6.0.2 or a change in the way JSF works. Could someone tell me? If t

Re: Problem with JSF 1.2 converters in Tomcat 6.0.2

I downloaded a snapshot of the sources today and have verified that the converter problem is solved. The page that uses a converter in jsf-cardemo works fine now. Thanks. Martin On 11/29/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Dubuc wrote: > There seems to be a pro

Re: Problem with JSF 1.2 converters in Tomcat 6.0.2

I am running jsf-1.2_02-b03-FCS. Martin On 11/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What version of JSF 1.2 are you running exactly? >There seems to be a problem with Converter subclasses when running a >JSF 1.2 Web app inside Tomcat 6.0.2. This problem can be reproduced by >run

Problem with JSF 1.2 converters in Tomcat 6.0.2

There seems to be a problem with Converter subclasses when running a JSF 1.2 Web app inside Tomcat 6.0.2. This problem can be reproduced by running the JSF car demo Web app that comes with the JSF 1.2 distribution. To reproduce, in the car demo startup page, choose locale (click English for instan