ng that will be worth of adoption.
Comments?
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: AccessLogValve enhancement
2012/3/29 Mark Claassen :
> After thinking about this some more
about this in the issue.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
Is this something that could be adopted in a future 7.0 release?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:markclaass...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:17 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
7, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/3/27 Mark Claassen :
> >
> > I did a quick performance test, and it is true that the default mechanism
> > is quite a bit faster than the standard JULI logger. For this test, I
> just
> > modified the source code to
Ok. I am back working on this again.
>From the previous comments, I am not sure my efforts are going in the right
direction. However, I have a working implementation that uses the standard
logging mechanism now, while addressing some of the previous concerns.
I did a quick performance test, and
I haven't had too much time to work on this in the past week, but will try
to take another crack at something the weekend. Thanks for all the
comments. I will try to find a way that address these concerns, and does
not get too big or complicated.
Another route to take, would be to just add more
My initial motivation for doing this was in trying to figure out a way to
have the logs automatically delete old ones eventually. I couldn't find a
way to do it, looked at the source, and got a bit sidetracked. The rest is
history
On Feb 19, 2012 12:50 PM, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP
Apologies. Won't happen again. I saw an attachment on an email from the
15th, but I see this was just junk.
I created at issue for this (52688) and attached the diffs.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/2/17 Mark Claassen :
> > I attached the two n
that this change is unacceptable, I will continue my
efforts and see what happens with it.
Thanks,
Mark
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/2/16 Mark Claassen :
> > We would like to use the flexibility of the standard logging mechanism
> for
> >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15/02/2012 21:23, Mark Claassen wrote:
> > We would like to use the flexibility of the standard logging mechanism
> for
> > the AccessLogValue. I could find no way to do this. Looking at the
> > AccessLogVa
We would like to use the flexibility of the standard logging mechanism for
the AccessLogValue. I could find no way to do this. Looking at the
AccessLogValve code in Tomcat 7, it seems it would really would not be hard
to add.
There already is standard logger in the AccessLogValve class, which is
The tomcat build downloads commons-collections but never uses it. It seems
this could be removed from the build scripts
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 1:24 PM
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: MD5 checksums when building
I am trying to build Tomcat from source and I am curious about something.
On the Tomcat download page it say the following:
> "You must verify the integrity of the downloaded files."
Yet, the Tomcat build blindly downloads all kinds of sources that are not
verified in any way. ANT can do MD5 chec
do it.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:12 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat and OCSP
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday,
Mark, do you have anymore details what this
>> would involve?
>> Filip
>>
>> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> > Mark,
>> > If you submit a patch for OCSP support, I'll gladly review it, and
>> > I imagine several other people would be interested as w
view it, and I
> > imagine several other people would be interested as well.
> >
> > Yoav
> >
> > On 12/8/06, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I asked this on the user list, but perhaps this is a question
> >> better for here. I h
, 2006 3:03 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and OCSP
Mark,
If you submit a patch for OCSP support, I'll gladly review it, and I imagine
several other people would be interested as well.
Yoav
On 12/8/06, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked this on the
I asked this on the user list, but perhaps this is a question better for
here. I have been using Tomcat for a while, but have not been developing
yet really (although I did submit a patch a while ago to the CGIServlet).
However, this OCSP issue has potential to really hit the fan for us and if
the
ginal Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Binary build procedures
> Just out of curiosity, when you say above "if something goes wrong" do
> you
mean with your stuff or
> Just out of curiosity, when you say above "if something goes wrong" do you
mean with your stuff or with the Tomcat build?
Here is an anecdote to describe what I mean.
While using 5.0, we had problems with the CGIServlet. It would not handle
uploads well at all. The problem was that the read w
a runtime
configuration for this?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yoav
Shapira
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:14 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Binary build procedures
Hola,
On 5/23/06, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e at this
point does allow for easy audits.
If you are really paranoid - build your binary from the appropriate TAG
would be safest since you are getting the original source - not repackaged
versions.
-Tim
Mark Claassen wrote:
> My boss has implemented some new procedures with regard to open
rust binaries but do trust sources, you always
have the option of grabbing the latter distro and building the binary
yourself ;)
Yoav
On 5/23/06, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My boss has implemented some new procedures with regard to open source
> projects. He be
My boss has implemented some new procedures with regard to open source
projects. He believes the source distributions are trustworthy, but he is
not sure if he trusts the binary distributions. I think the reasoning is
that he is uncertain if the binary distributions are controlled as well as
the
23 matches
Mail list logo
