Re: WebDAV lock null and RFC 4918

2024-10-16 Thread Julian Reschke
Am 16.10.2024 um 12:14 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: Hi, I spent a few days going through the behavior of the WebDAV Servlet, expanding on a test scenario, and looking at the most recent RFC. I found many items to fix. Three items remain: - Propatch support: it is useless without support for dead pro

Fwd: Working Group Last Call: HTTP Core Documents

2021-01-14 Thread Julian Reschke
(FY) Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Working Group Last Call: HTTP Core Documents Weitersenden-Datum: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:49:41 + Weitersenden-Von: ietf-http...@w3.org Datum: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:49:22 -0800 Von:Tommy Pauly An: HTTP Working Grou

Re: [Bug 61103] StatementCache potentially returning incorrect statement

2017-09-25 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2017-09-21 16:04, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103 --- Comment #2 from Julian Reschke --- Still present in 7.0.81. Hi there. Is there anything I can do to get a Tomcat JDBC expert to look into this? FWIW, this issue is 100% reproducible; it

Re: jdbc pool: validationQuery vs Connection.isValid

2016-01-06 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2016-01-06 15:21, Christopher Schultz wrote: Julian, On 1/6/16 7:42 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: On 2016-01-06 00:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: Julian, On 1/5/16 9:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: Hi there, maybe that's a stupid question, but why do we need a configurable validationQuery

Re: jdbc pool: validationQuery vs Connection.isValid

2016-01-06 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2016-01-06 00:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: Julian, On 1/5/16 9:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: Hi there, maybe that's a stupid question, but why do we need a configurable validationQuery when there's Connection.isValid(...) <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs

jdbc pool: validationQuery vs Connection.isValid

2016-01-05 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi there, maybe that's a stupid question, but why do we need a configurable validationQuery when there's Connection.isValid(...) Best regards, Julian

Re: [Bug 54729] new HttpParser.parseAuthorizationBasic method

2013-03-21 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2013-03-21 10:15, Mark Thomas wrote: ... I'm sorry you feel that your efforts have been wasted. My intention was to get you a robust Base64 implementation to work with for the other improvements you had in mind for BASIC auth. If there are other improvements you have in mind for BASIC auth the

Re: tomcat bad encoding

2012-07-10 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-07-10 19:03, Thushara Wijeratna wrote: Is it possible to have tomcat treat bad URI encodings leniently? It currently modifies a buffer in place and if a % sign is followed by anything other than 2 hexadecimal characters, it gives up decoding and throws an exception. But if this method was

Re: Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread Julian Reschke
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The standard is only 7 1/2 years old; http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965 But that's for "Cookie2" (the thing people should use), not "Cookie" (the thing people *do* use). BR, Julian - To unsubscrib

Re: Possible bug with ETag in 304 responses - dev input requested

2007-05-20 Thread Julian Reschke
Len Popp wrote: The issue was originally raised by Joe Mun on the Tomcat Users list: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=117934336727314&w=2 I looked at the behaviour in Tomcat 5.5.23 and it looks like Tomcat is not handling ETag headers as required by the HTTP spec, when it returns a 304 ("not mo