Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

2007-02-05 Thread Jacob Hookom
It'd be good to get a public update out there to run the new JSF releases as part of JEE 5 (I realize this is at the bottom of most other's priorities). Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ According to the (slightly) up

Re: tldCache oddities

2006-12-04 Thread Jacob Hookom
Was there ever a condition where the listeners wouldn't run? Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I tested JSF since some people said the listener wasn't being found (the said listener is declared in a TLD which is in a JAR). I found it worked very well, but the way it is handled is funny because of the

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.3 alpha release

2006-12-04 Thread Jacob Hookom
+1 Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, In line with what Filip wanted to have, I propose releasing a new 6.0.3 test build, which will incorporate the fixes that have been made since 6.0.2. Comments ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Deferred Evaluation and Error Handling

2006-03-10 Thread Jacob Hookom
With the new EL-API, EL expressions can be created, stored, and evaluated later. One of the biggest complaints is that when these EL expressions are evaluated later, there's no context as to where the error came from in the JSP doc. The goal is to have the file and line number included in exc

TCK Use

2006-03-06 Thread Jacob Hookom
of the org.apache.el explicitly in the Jasper code base 2) Minimize the use of org.apache.el implementation references to possibly allow other EL implementations (even for alternate syntaxes) to be used at runtime, such as using a JEXL or OGNL ExpressionFactory w/ JSP. -- Jacob Ho

Re: What's about unloading policy of jsp-servlets ?

2006-03-05 Thread Jacob Hookom
the current compilation is not the only solution or only way to generate java from the jsps. I also agree with you that JSPs are complex enough that messing with the code generation is too dangerous - I wouldn't touch it, but if some people have patches, we should consider them. Costin

Re: New EL - Split Off from Tomcat 6

2006-02-28 Thread Jacob Hookom
You can't compare a JSR spec to something like commons-logging, plus there are people requesting that it's separate for practical use. Remy Maucherat wrote: Jacob Hookom wrote: I would like to suggest splitting EL off as a separate library from Tomcat. The EL-API is expected to r

New EL - Split Off from Tomcat 6

2006-02-27 Thread Jacob Hookom
I would like to suggest splitting EL off as a separate library from Tomcat. The EL-API is expected to rev in it's own specification in the future. It is not have any dependencies on the Servlet API or JSP API and can be utilized in the same fashion as the commons-el project. -- Jacob H

JSP 2.1 Update

2006-02-01 Thread Jacob Hookom
ical to just use the org.apache.el for expression validation without maintaining a separate set of parsing logic within jasper itself? I guess coming from the Facelets project, I just delegated pre-parsing to the javax.el.ExpressionFactory instead of re-implementing the EL-spec within the compile

Re: Initial EL/JSP 2.1 Contribution

2006-01-16 Thread Jacob Hookom
ords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis

Initial EL/JSP 2.1 Contribution

2006-01-09 Thread Jacob Hookom
27;ve been rolling this code base into JSP 2.1 within a local sandbox, but I still have questions about the particulars of the overal project packaging for Tomcat 6. Best Regards Everyone -- Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis JSF-EG, JSF-RI, EL

EL and JSP 2.1

2005-12-26 Thread Jacob Hookom
g and code placement-- are there 'rules' the group is expecting? Also, would you like to keep the EL separate and instead guide EL implementation into Commons-EL? If anyone has any clarifications, questions, or recommendations, just let me know-- -- Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis