RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the > welcome-file list on the Tomcat side. > > This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is > visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Look, I don't wish to go into discussion with you, because > you obviously already have your perspective (IMHO wrong). ?!?! Well, of corse I have mine... > >> Static content delivery by Apache requires thorough application > >> design so that it can be served outside the application itself. >

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > > Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to > tomcat as a sub-request, but instead seems to tweek the req->main > field, which may probably create the kind of

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Hi, > > I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to > do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I > find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be > non-trivial. > > The behaviour needs to be described depending on Dir