At 18:20 27/11/2005 +, you wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
I can't really dispute the interpretation of
the spec, but the change is likely to break many more webapps then it fixes :(.
I thought this too. However, I think we should
implement the spec as is. If we start relaxing
it here, then wh
At 00:35 24/11/2005 -0800, you wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Author: costin
> Date: Wed Nov 23 21:34:19 2005
> New Revision: 348665
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348665&view=rev
> Log:
> Another experiment - this class uses NIO to get the socke
+1 on building with 1.5 by default, *as long as
it doesn't preventing tc from running on 1.4* (we
use tc 5.5 / Java 1.4 in production right now,
with no sign of switching JDK in the near future).
If it breaks 1.4 compatibility, wait for tc 6.0 to switch compiler version.
How about building Jav
At 16:26 11/11/2005 -0800, you wrote:
Nice, it would be good if everyone asking a
question would offer something - a beer, hosting, etc :-)
All right then! A beer or any drink of your
choice to any Tomcat developer going through
Paris, for any open bug in BugZilla! :-)
As this email won't l
