2011/12/20 Antonio Petrelli
> 2011/12/20 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 20/12/2011 09:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> > 2011/12/20 Antonio Petrelli :
>>
>> >> Whoops! I had to do it before :-)
>> >> First of all, Git is read-only at Apache:
>> >>
2011/12/20 Mark Thomas
> On 20/12/2011 09:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > 2011/12/20 Antonio Petrelli :
>
> >> Whoops! I had to do it before :-)
> >> First of all, Git is read-only at Apache:
> >> http://git.apache.org/
> >> In this page there are
2011/12/20 Mark Thomas
> If there is an easy way to create these in Maven and creating them with
> the Ant script is difficult / painful / error prone, then that would be
> an argument in favour of Maven. How strong that argument is would depend
> on how easy it was to do this with Maven and how
2011/12/20 Konstantin Kolinko
> The current version of m2e(clipse) in its default configuration
> (re)downloads 200Mb index file from Maven Central into my workspace,
> hanging IDE in the process.
>
>
Never seen that... Or, at least, it does not hang.
Ant is surely easier to run and it comes wit
2011/12/19 Pid
> On 18/12/2011 08:37, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >> As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
> >>
> >
> > I simply cannot understand why some folks have
> > almost religiou
2011/12/20 jean-frederic clere
> On 12/20/2011 09:17 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/19 Mladen Turk
>>
>> On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>
>>> Exactly. Since any change would require a learning curve
>>>>
>&g
2011/12/19 David Jencks
> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has been
> maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out of tomcat
> svn and puts it in an appropriately structured maven mutli-project build
> and we've been re-releasing quite a few tomcat v
2011/12/19 Mladen Turk
> On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> Exactly. Since any change would require a learning curve
>>> and it seems we don't have that many (read none) maven
>>> experts in the house, Gradle could be equally considered,
>>> given that it seems more advanced in custo
2011/12/19 Caldarale, Charles R
> > From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:antonio.petre...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: Move to Maven? (WAS: Re: Publishing process for JARs for
> Maven Central)
>
> > > Switching to a single source tree was one of the
> > > best ch
2011/12/19 sebb
> On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli
> wrote:
> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> >
> >> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
> >> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encou
This is exactly one thing I would like to avoid :-D
Antonio
2011/12/19
> Author: olamy
> Date: Mon Dec 19 08:50:05 2011
> New Revision: 1220657
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220657&view=rev
> Log:
> dependency on ClusterRuleSet has been removed and now really optionnal, no
> more n
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
> > structure. The source should go into src/main/java, the resources in
> > src/main/resou
2011/12/18 Mladen Turk
> On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>
>> As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
>>
>>
> I simply cannot understand why some folks have
> almost religious fascination with Maven.
>
In fact I feel as a Maven evangel
As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> > Using Maven has several benefits (standardization of structure, lots of
> > reusable plugins, supported by major IDEs),
>
> Those are features, not benefits.
>
The standardization of structure is not a feature, but a c
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:42, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> >
> >> On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >>> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> >>>
> >>>> On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> >
> >> On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >>> Ok then interprete my words as: now you can use a staging repository.
> >>> This way, ar
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > Ok then interprete my words as: now you can use a staging repository.
> > This way, artifacts may be tested *before* they are released.
>
> The scp+rsync process also has a staging repository (and
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:08, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > 2011/12/16 Mark Thomas
> >
> >> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
> >> 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
> >> 2. Nexus
> >>
> >
> &
2011/12/16 Mark Thomas
> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
> 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
> 2. Nexus
>
In my experience in Tiles releases, the only problem we had with scp +
simple copy (we did not use rsync) is that this process breaks Maven
metadata.
I try to
2011/12/16 Mark Thomas
> On 16/12/2011 16:06, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > Please Mark calm down.
>
> No, I will not calm down. The release process has been changed without
> prior discussion and on top of that it is now broken for Maven
> artefacts. That is not acceptable.
&
Please Mark calm down.
Being possible to deploy to Nexus does not mean that the project is
configured to do that. To enable this, you need to configure the needed POM
metadata (SCM, website) and let the master POM of Tomcat be child of the
Apache Master pom.
Even if you have done this steps, if you
Can you stop this madness?
Antonio
2008/3/6, MDaemon at qualitas.it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not contain a valid command for
> this mail server to process. No action has been taken. For information on
> valid commands, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Could you stop this madness, please?
2008/3/6, MDaemon at qualitas.it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not contain a valid command for
> this mail server to process. No action has been taken. For information on
> valid commands, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
2007/12/10, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This is a hack. This may work great for you, and that's the whole point
> of using OSS, but this is not a solution for others.
Here I disagree: at Struts we were discussing one big problem with JSP (that
depends on the specification, not the pl
24 matches
Mail list logo
