Re: [PR] Adding nonstandard support for c:set and c:remove [tomcat]

2025-04-15 Thread via GitHub
jengebr commented on PR #842: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/842#issuecomment-2806882710 > Thinking long term, I am wondering whether we need to provide the ability for users to customise these optimisations. If we do then we can add something like a `GeneratorFactory` and users

Re: [PR] Adding nonstandard support for c:set and c:remove [tomcat]

2025-04-15 Thread via GitHub
jengebr commented on code in PR #842: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/842#discussion_r2045083458 ## java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java: ## @@ -3028,6 +3036,195 @@ public String generateNamedAttributeJspFragment(Node.NamedAttribute n, String ta

Re: [PR] Adding nonstandard support for c:set and c:remove [tomcat]

2025-04-15 Thread via GitHub
jengebr commented on code in PR #842: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/842#discussion_r2045072065 ## java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/JspRuntimeLibrary.java: ## @@ -957,4 +957,21 @@ public static void releaseTag(Tag tag, InstanceManager instanceManager) { }

Re: [PR] Adding nonstandard support for c:set and c:remove [tomcat]

2025-04-15 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf commented on code in PR #842: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/842#discussion_r2045039959 ## java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/JspRuntimeLibrary.java: ## @@ -957,4 +957,21 @@ public static void releaseTag(Tag tag, InstanceManager instanceManager) { }

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas --- Thanks for the test case. I've just run a test with wrk and HTTP keep-alive disabled using a single thread making ~750 req/s for 5 minutes without any occurrence of this error on both the Temurin and the Zu

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 sephir...@sephiroth-j.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40026|Dynatrace: requests with|Dynatrace: requests with

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 sephir...@sephiroth-j.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40026|Dynatrace: requests with|Dynatrace: requests with

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #12 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40026 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40026&action=edit Dynatrace: requests with exception 2025-04-25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are t

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #9 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40023 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40023&action=edit Dynatrace: request with exception code level -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #11 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40025 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40025&action=edit Dynatrace: request without exception timing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #8 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40022 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40022&action=edit Dynatrace: request with exception 2 threads -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #10 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40024 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40024&action=edit Dynatrace: request with exception timing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #7 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- Created attachment 40021 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40021&action=edit sample soap-service app A sample app to deploy. The error should occur when making an HTTP GET re

[Bug 69631] java.nio.channels.WritePendingException when using https-openssl-nio2 and virtual threads

2025-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #6 from sephir...@sephiroth-j.de --- I have checked the logs in Splunk and Dynatrace. As suspected, the timestamps from Splunk match the check requests from Kubernetes to the servlet endpoint. According to Dynatrace, the request alwa