https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69545
--- Comment #10 from Aravinda ---
Sorry Correcting my earlier message.
Its working in the blocking mode and not working consistently in the
non-blocking mode.
Is there a possibility it is considering only the chunk of data in the buffer
(in n
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69545
--- Comment #9 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Aravinda from comment #8)
> For the non blocking mode, this is working fine.
> The issue is happening in the spring cloud gateway application(blocking
> mode) which will just delegate the req
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69532
--- Comment #5 from John Engebretson ---
Created attachment 39979
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39979&action=edit
Tomcat 9 proposed patch
I've attached a patch that improves on the current state in lots of ways:
1. No
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69545
--- Comment #8 from Aravinda ---
For the non blocking mode, this is working fine.
The issue is happening in the spring cloud gateway application(blocking mode)
which will just delegate the request to the downstream application after some
proce
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69532
--- Comment #4 from John Engebretson ---
Interestingly, ExpressionFactory.newInstance() uses the same locking logic as
Util.getExpressionFactory(). Looks like a copy-and-modify from one to the
other.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69545
--- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat ---
After trying many things and tracing, I cannot find a way to trigger
available() in blocking mode when it would likely return non 0 despite having
no meaningful bytes (in particular using the
TestChunkedIn
