https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
--- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat ---
It does not show the request that causes this, so why are you certain it is
caused by the stricter lock refresh behavior ? Please provide more details on
the error.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
--- Comment #3 from shekhar ---
Edit in Office Functionality not working
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
--- Comment #2 from shekhar ---
Created attachment 39967
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39967&action=edit
Edit in office (WEBDAVSERVLET) 10.1.34 stop working snapshot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
Chuck,
QUADRUPLE SPAM!
-chris
On 1/9/25 12:52 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69531
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69531
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Summary|SPAM SPAM
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69531
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|https://godseye.in/ |SPAM SPAM SPAM
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69531
Bug ID: 69531
Summary: https://godseye.in/
Product: Taglibs
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new f182b68b35 Avoid caching bogus 0 content length
f182
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new a037dee3c0 Avoid caching bogus 0 content length
a0
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push:
new 4efa851446 Avoid caching bogus 0 content length
4e
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 80ae858419 Avoid caching bogus 0 content length
80ae85
On 09/01/2025 14:53, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:17 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
My current plan is to create InputBuffer with bb set to a zero length
ByteBuffer and have recycle (re)set it to a zero length ByteBuffer. That
avoids the NPEs, avoids retaining references unnecessar
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new cb857a86a4 Replace the unused buffer with a zero leng
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:17 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 09/01/2025 14:01, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > markt pushed a commit to branch main
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
> >
> >
> > The f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419
--- Comment #7 from John Engebretson ---
This change reached production and had a greater-than-expected impact, totaling
approximately 0.2% of cpu. I can't explain the gap but hypothesize the lack of
recursion enabled inlining, which enables f
On 09/01/2025 14:01, ma...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 1f417
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 1f4175d65c Refactor so the buffered data is used dire
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Remy Mau
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
shekhar changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69530
Bug ID: 69530
Summary: Major different between 10.1.31 and 10.1.34 (class
file doLock Method)
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.34
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69527
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 39966
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39966&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69527
--- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Vigneshwaran N from comment #5)
> (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #2)
> > This reads like an AI generated report ...
>
> Hi Remy, the above content that you are mentioned as AI gener
22 matches
Mail list logo
