dsoumis commented on PR #731:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/731#issuecomment-2151524740
@isapir My expectation was that "ant ide-intellij" should work out of the
box without requiring any adjustments.
Currently, to use an SDK version lower than 22, you must exclude
`/java/o
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69114
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://writeforusarchitect |
|ure.com/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69114
Rahul Joshi changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://writeforusarchitect
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69114
Bug ID: 69114
Summary: Write For Us: Architecture
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://writeforusarchitect |
|ure.com/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
Rahul Joshi changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
URL|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69113
Bug ID: 69113
Summary: Write For Us: Architecture
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
isapir commented on PR #731:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/731#issuecomment-2150273321
@dsoumis But now you are completely excluding
`/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/openssl/panama` and
`/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/openssl`? It might "work" on Java 17 but new
technology woul
isapir commented on PR #733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/733#issuecomment-2150229542
Is `tstamp.iso.release` defined at that spot @dsoumis ? If so, maybe we can
set a default for `ant.tstamp.now.iso` to be `tstamp.iso.release`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
dsoumis commented on PR #733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/733#issuecomment-2150200992
When running `ant deploy` to reproduce the build, `pre-release` target will
not have been executed, ant.tstamp.now.iso has no value assigned and the
following output is written:
> bui
Build status: Build succeeded!
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/37/builds/973
Blamelist: Christopher Schultz , Mark Thomas
Build Text: build successful
Status Detected: restored build
Build Source Stamp: [branch 9.0.x] d52f822c29b9871f4a08927331d9054c569750ec
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
schultz pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new d52f822c29 Add deprecation metadata to methods mo
dsoumis opened a new pull request, #733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/733
…l libraries
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dsoumis commented on PR #731:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/731#issuecomment-2149133573
On second thoughts, I believe ide-support should strictly follow build.xml
rules.
As build.xml
[excludes](https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/main/build.xml#L1014) openssl
and panama
15 matches
Mail list logo
