Build status: Build succeeded!
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/955
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: build successful
Status Detected: restored build
Build Source Stamp: [branch main] eb38a8416732f34a0fe7522a2012681d569e0fb0
Steps:
worker_preparation:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
dub...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from dub...@gmail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677
Bug ID: 68677
Summary: no support for enviroment variables/request attributes
Product: Tomcat Connectors
Version: 1.2.49
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/954
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status Detected: new failure
Build Source Stamp: [branch main] 14eafaa620b900fc7d73f7a88035117ad5dd40f7
St
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new a3255b5e93 Explain the Java 22 check
a3255b5e93 is d
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new ed83bb9fbf Explain the Java 22 check
ed83bb9fbf is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new eb38a84167 Explain the Java 22 check
eb38a84167 is des
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 4e288be9c9 Remove old javadoc
4e288be9c9 is describe
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new ce631eebd7 Remove old javadoc
ce631eebd7 is describe
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 3d665c04d3 Remove old javadoc
3d665c04d3 is descri
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 14eafaa620 Remove old javadoc
14eafaa620 is described
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 2:25 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> Rémy,
>
> On 2/23/24 08:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose backporting the OpenSSL FFM support to Tomcat 10.1.
> >
> > Java 22.0.0 should be released on March 19, and the next Java LTS
> > should still ha
rmaucher commented on PR #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964203702
I feel ok with this sort of thread safety additions [there could be a lot !]
if they have a system property to enable them. Then it becomes useful as a way
to detect problems, although I do
markt-asf commented on PR #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699#issuecomment-1964191235
@ChristopherSchultz I don't think so. We'd see test failures if that were
the case.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
markt-asf commented on PR #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964174647
Fair point.
The complicating factor is that there are so many entry points that a
non-container thread could use. A complete solution would need to, effectively,
wrap the `Response`
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699#issuecomment-1964139328
@markt-asf Any chance this was a copy/paste error that should be corrected
in a different way (e.g. there is actually a missing cipher)?
--
This is an automated message from the
Rémy,
On 2/23/24 08:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose backporting the OpenSSL FFM support to Tomcat 10.1.
Java 22.0.0 should be released on March 19, and the next Java LTS
should still have no problem targeting Java 11. As a result, there
should be no negative impact to the
rmaucher commented on PR #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964127701
Anywhere else can also be similarly synced, then. I don't think it is a good
idea to insert random thread safety safeguards in addition to what the
specification mandates. Time for a system
Mark,
On 2/22/24 15:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/02/2024 20:03, S. Ali Tokmen wrote:
Dear Tomcat development team
The Tomcat 8.5.99 artifacts not in Maven central.
Is this normal?
No.
I've just checked and they weren't promoted from the staging repository.
I've just done that. They should
All,
On 2/20/24 03:05, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
The first JDK 22 Release Candidates builds are now available [1]. At this
stage, only P1 issues will still be evaluated. And with the JDK 22 General
Availability set for March 19th, it is now
Author: schultz
Date: Mon Feb 26 13:14:51 2024
New Revision: 67586
Log:
Remove old release artifacts.
Removed:
release/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.18/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional co
Author: schultz
Date: Mon Feb 26 13:14:12 2024
New Revision: 67585
Log:
Remove old releae artifacts.
Removed:
release/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional comma
markt-asf opened a new pull request, #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700
Providing this as a PR as it isn't strictly a Tomcat bug or Tomcat's problem
to solve. That said, we do see some asynchronous bug reports and this might
help highlight application issues early and redu
Le lun. 26 févr. 2024 à 13:16, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sounds very good overall but would be great to not do it at the cost to
> > break tomcat IDE support maybe - current status since it uses a single
> > mod
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sounds very good overall but would be great to not do it at the cost to
> break tomcat IDE support maybe - current status since it uses a single
> module and not all IDE support to compile supackages with different target
>
dsoumis opened a new pull request, #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
26 matches
Mail list logo
