https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #30 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #28)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #27)
> > The issue is not whether or not anyone is still using OpenSSL 1.0.2 today,
> > but whether or no
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 55d2fa3150 Correct regression in fix for BZ 67675 -
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new f3eee8e28c Correct regression in fix for BZ 67675 -
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new dd0689c911 Correct regression in fix for BZ 67675
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new e8d5ac173d Correct regression in fix for BZ 67675 - a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #28 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #27)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #23)
> > While 1.0.2 has been EOL for a while it would not surprise me at all to find
> > lots of 1.0.2 generated
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #27 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #23)
> While 1.0.2 has been EOL for a while it would not surprise me at all to find
> lots of 1.0.2 generated keys and certs still in use.
+1
The issue is not
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas ---
Yes, this should be fixed for the next release round which is currently
scheduled for January.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #25 from Garo ---
That was fast! Does this mean that it will be fixed in an upcoming release? By
the way, thank you for being so responsive and reproducing this so quickly. (In
reply to Mark Thomas from comment #24)
> Confirmed. It
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas ---
Confirmed. It is a regression. OpenSSL 1.0.2 doesn't specify the PRF so the
default should apply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 4e9d600d38f1f59826aeb0edaba299be1109f9ad
Author: remm
AuthorDate: Thu Dec 14 11:11:07 2023 +0100
Sync OpenSSL jextract
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit c73e6335f39c0d5de73fdd28a69b8699ed109941
Author: remm
AuthorDate: Thu Dec 14 11:13:45 2023 +0100
Sync cleanups
---
..
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a change to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
from 29323ed485 Improve verify-release
new 4e9d600d38 Sync OpenSSL jextract
new c73e6335f3 Sync cleanups
The 2 revi
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit c04f072339e94e9b0ee16b2fe704fbd409daeea7
Author: remm
AuthorDate: Thu Dec 14 11:11:07 2023 +0100
Sync OpenSSL jextrac
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 625f3c166b46f00661e7a6ac4f0a95c485962ffe
Author: remm
AuthorDate: Thu Dec 14 11:13:45 2023 +0100
Sync cleanups
---
.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a change to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
from 488934245b Add release date for 10.1.17.
new c04f072339 Sync OpenSSL jextract
new 625f3c166b Sync cleanups
Th
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8569361da2 Sync cleanups
8569361da2 is described below
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 601586edd7 Sync OpenSSL jextract
601586edd7 is describ
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas ---
Tomcat ships OpenSSL binaries are part of the Tomcat Native distribution. I
need to go back a bit but we have 1.0.2 binaries.
For now, this looks like a regression so I'm happy handling it here.
While 1.0.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #22 from ggar ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #21)
> The algorithm is being read as the pseudo random function and failing.
>
> I need to see if I can find (or build) an OpenSSL 1.0.2 binary.
Mark, there are several link
21 matches
Mail list logo
