+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I agree.
It's a good test and it has very well done the job.
+1 with the approach. Seems reasonable
Le sam. 12 nov. 2022, 12:23, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 11/11/2022 14:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung
> wrote:
> >>
> >> FYI: the performance check Test
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66346
--- Comment #1 from John Neffenger ---
See GitHub pull request:
Allow reproducible builds of all JDBC JAR files
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/566
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
jgneff opened a new pull request, #566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/566
Fixes [Bug 66346](https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66346).
Only the first change is required to fix the timestamps in
`tomcat-jdbc-src.jar`, but this seemed a good time to fix the timestamps
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66346
John Neffenger changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://lists.reproducible-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66346
Bug ID: 66346
Summary: Allow reproducible builds of all JDBC JAR files
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severi
Subscribe
Sent from my iPad
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 11/11/2022 14:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung wrote:
FYI: the performance check TestMessageBytes.testConversionPerformance()
seems to fail sometimes for various Linux variants and JVM versions. It
fails in 13 out of 116 combinations of Linux distro, JVM
14 matches
Mail list logo