https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66196
--- Comment #6 from ttera ---
When will it be backported to v8.5, 9 and 10.0?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66304
--- Comment #4 from glenn_...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #3)
> Wow, that's a pretty bad security problem in PlantUML IMHO.
I agree. I already made a bug report in the PlantUML Server GitHub repo.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66294
--- Comment #2 from Maximilian Hensel ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Given that the SecurityManager is heading towards deprecation, why not just
> run without a SecurityManager to avoid this hotspot?
We've checked this, but un
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/555#issuecomment-1277719549
> > It usually does make sense. See
https://www.baeldung.com/java-collection-toarray-methods
>
> Wow, interesting, it turns out that there is a difference in performance
be
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/555#issuecomment-1277717245
If we _really_ want to improve performance, we should be using static
zero-sized arrays instead of instantiating them each time. A zero-item array is
immutable, and thus infinitel
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66304
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
Wow, that's a pretty bad security problem in PlantUML IMHO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.