https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Jung ---
It seems the crash happens in the second parent during the Apache startup. On
Unix/Linux Apache creates a first parent, then replaces it by another parent
and then starts the children. The first parent valid
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Schultz ---
Are you able to build a patched version of mod_jk? I'd like to add some logging
to figure out what's happening.
It looks like we are trying to "clean" an APR memory pool and something is
wrong with
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #9 from Lothar ---
Created attachment 38250
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38250&action=edit
Dumpfile
I replaced sensitive data, hoepfully completely and without damaging the dump
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
Lothar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Lothar ---
is it thi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66008
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Jasper |Documentation
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from Chr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009
--- Comment #11 from Maikel ---
Thanks for the quick reply and fixing the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66008
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Seebass ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> This seems like a matter of opinion over the definition of "useless".
>
> The whole point of the option *is* to affect the output.
>
Thanks for your
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 973589b31e 66009: Use getSubjectX500Principal().toSt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new e0bca1ca88 66009: Use getSubjectX500Principal().toSt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push:
new 8f474f0ae3 66009: Use getSubjectX500Principal().to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 7c0dd42ac4 66009: Use getSubjectX500Principal().toStri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #9 from Remy Mauchera
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
Lothar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Lothar ---
status ch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66009
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
Using your test, I can see that getName(RFC1779) formatting matches
getSubjectDN, and RFC2253 does not.
Now, with a certificate with more stuff inside, I get something where
getSubjectDN returns EMAILADDR
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #5 from Lothar ---
Hi Christopher,
yes, these where the last log entries.
I attached the full debug logs.
Sorry, but I can`t upload the core file.
This behavior is since last patching of RHEL8.
But right now, I don`t know, which of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #4 from Lothar ---
Created attachment 38248
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38248&action=edit
debug log related to vHost
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #3 from Lothar ---
Created attachment 38247
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38247&action=edit
debug logs related to server level
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
20 matches
Mail list logo