https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65037
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65037
Bug ID: 65037
Summary: Supports deploy Java EE web application to tomcat 10+
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.4
Status: NEW
hazendaz closed pull request #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/26
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
arjantijms commented on pull request #399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/399#issuecomment-751867518
> @arjantijms why not using a valve as most integrators?
You can't add a valve from your war, so that puts additional constraints on
the user. For a simple integration wit
rmannibucau commented on pull request #399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/399#issuecomment-751862090
@arjantijms why not using a valve as most integrators?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
arjantijms opened a new pull request #399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/399
For consistency with Request, and practically for external code that needs
to integrate with Tomcat and e.g. needs access to the notes.
Signed-off-by: arjantijms
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Satya from comment #6)
> Thanks for your quick responses.
>
> could you please let me know , which version of Tomcat contains the fix for
> this issue.
It is not fixed yet.
(In reply to Sat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #6 from Satya ---
Thanks for your quick responses.
could you please let me know , which version of Tomcat contains the fix for
this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #5 from Satya ---
could you please provide some information with sample example on how to
configure connectionPoolSize(connectionPoolSize="2"). i will test and provide
the results.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat ---
Thanks, that's what I thought. When using a single connection, then get() locks
but never unlocks if there is an exception there. I should have a patch
shortly, but I'm trying to verify with a test. As a w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #3 from Satya ---
Below is the stcktarce
"https-jsse-nio-8443-exec-4" #70 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7f6a784f4800
nid=0x1cc8b5 waiting on condition [0x7f6a541f]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #2 from Satya ---
Created attachment 37654
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37654&action=edit
Tomcat 8.5.60/61 User authentication with JNDIRealm failure stacktrace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Le lun. 28 déc. 2020 à 13:48, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 4:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > wonder if there is some work planned in tomcat 10 to 1. makes it start
> > faster and 2. make jmx optional.
> >
> > I did some tests and locally a tomca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
This is caused by the refactoring which added connection pooling. I think I
have an idea of what the problem is (bad cleanup if the error is when calling
get() in authenticate, the connection object could
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 4:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> wonder if there is some work planned in tomcat 10 to 1. makes it start
> faster and 2. make jmx optional.
>
> I did some tests and locally a tomcat start is about 400ms.
> I was surprised to see that Registry.disableRegi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
Satya changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--
You are receiving this mail because:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new a8ff4d2 [65022] Change tomcat access log attri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65022
mgrigorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 5d3b5c9 [65022] Change tomcat access log attri
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 6593fa7 [65022] Change tomcat access log att
martin-g merged pull request #397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/397
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
21 matches
Mail list logo
