On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.53 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.51 release are:
>
> - Add new attribute persistAuthentication to both StandardManager and
> PersistentManager to support authenti
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/1639
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSched
Author: violetagg
Date: Fri Mar 13 20:03:16 2020
New Revision: 38506
Log:
Tomcat 7.0.102 vote did not pass
Removed:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.102/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional co
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
violetagg pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push:
new 81e48b3 Tomcat 7.0.102 vote did not pass
81e48
Message from: https://repository.apache.orgDescription:Tomcat 7.0.102 vote did not passDeployer properties:"userAgent" = "maven-artifact/2.2.1 (Java 1.7.0_80; Windows 8.1 6.3)""userId" = "violetagg""ip" = "78.83.99.114"Details:The orgapachetomcat-1259 staging repository has been dropped.Action perf
На пт, 13.03.2020 г. в 18:10 Mark Thomas написа:
>
> On 12/03/2020 12:39, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>
>
>
> > The proposed 7.0.102 release is:
> > [X] Broken - do not release
> > [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.102 Stable
>
> Sorry.
>
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64226
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
Yet another wonderful feature of SimpleDateFormat. I had no idea that parsing a
date string could poison the time zone of a SimpleDateFormat object.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/13/20 07:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/03/2020 11:37, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git
>> repository.
>>
>> markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository
>> https://gitbox.apache.o
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661
--- Comment #6 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5)
> See https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/servlet-api/issues/307 for a description
> of what other containers do.
>
> Options appear to be:
> a) container sends it af
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #17 from Roland ---
Okay, then sorry again. I saw that the "/" removal for jarPath happened in
WebappClassLoaderBase and I was afraid that it needs to be done for the call in
line 1594 too for satisfying other callers than WebappSer
На чт, 12.03.2020 г. в 14:39 Violeta Georgieva
написа:
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.102 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.102/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #15 from Roland ---
Sorry for the confusion. I found this by "visual inspection". You wrote "the
class loader being used hasn't got the same work-around that Tomcat's class
loader has". Is WebappClassLoaderBase the Tomcat class load
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm confused. How did removing the leading "/" manage to fix it for you as per
comment #10 if, with that fix applied, it is still broken?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
See https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/servlet-api/issues/307 for a description of
what other containers do.
Options appear to be:
a) container sends it after auth (current Tomcat behaviour)
b) container sends
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/1638
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedule
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Roland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
On 12/03/2020 12:39, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed 7.0.102 release is:
> [X] Broken - do not release
> [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.102 Stable
Sorry.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Fixed in 7.0.x
Mark
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Roland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmuelle...@posteo.de
--
You are receiving th
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push:
new 66d6ccf Additional fix for BZ 64191
66d6ccf is des
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
I suspect that is because the class loader being used hasn't got the same
work-around that Tomcat's class loader has.
I want to run a few tests first but I think the answer is going to be removing
the leadi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
rmuelle...@posteo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
Am 2020-03-13 um 15:35 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi all,
I am writing this up as this is a change I'd like to make in Tomcat 10
that I think is important to get right. It may also get back-ported.
This first arose in this mod_jk bug:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62459
Ignoring the
Hi all,
I am writing this up as this is a change I'd like to make in Tomcat 10
that I think is important to get right. It may also get back-ported.
This first arose in this mod_jk bug:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62459
Ignoring the mod_jk aspects for now (they will come later)
martin-g commented on issue #262: Fix and tests for tomcat bug #64226
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/262#issuecomment-598706509
IMO for the branches where Java 8 is minimum we should switch to Java 8
DateTime APIs.
java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter is thread-safe.
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/5027
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64226
Gary Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Gary Thomas ---
gazzyt opened a new pull request #262: Fix and tests for tomcat bug #64226
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/262
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64226
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
gazzyt closed pull request #261: Fix and unit test for bug 64226
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/261
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 7d9d931 Deprecate code that is removed in Tomcat 1
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
from 07aabd5 Add a check that the URIEncoding is a superset of US-ASCII.
new 571d076 Remove the checkNormalize test
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit cf7196b09d687c4ceb1c52830b405e1c60197181
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 13 12:01:17 2020 +
Remove depre
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 9b70c91abef924cc68b1a7f6bc4f1e9911e3e13a
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 13 11:59:38 2020 +
Deprecate un
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 571d07654ba28d1e75481b04d43d5b40b9d846bb
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 13 11:58:45 2020 +
Remove the c
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:50 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/03/2020 11:36, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>
>
> > You neither explain a breaking use case nor modules/owb has any
> > documentation :-/
> > But I will take your word and revert my change.
> >
> > If we should follow Romain's suggestion th
gazzyt opened a new pull request #261: Fix and unit test for bug 64226
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/261
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64226
Bug ID: 64226
Summary: Tomcat 9 can return HTTP date headers in timzone other
than GMT
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.27
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Se
On 13/03/2020 11:36, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> You neither explain a breaking use case nor modules/owb has any
> documentation :-/
> But I will take your word and revert my change.
>
> If we should follow Romain's suggestion then probably ejb, mail,
> persistence and transaction should not be in
On 13/03/2020 11:37, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 07aabd5 Add a check that the URIEncoding is a su
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-jakartaee-migration.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 4af8297 Revert "Add java
Hi Rémy,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:27 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:00 AM Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rémy,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:58 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:10 PM wrote:
>>>
This is an automated email from the ASF
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64221
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Don't do that.
>
> The unit tests expect TLS 1.3 to be supported when running on Java 11.
Granted, but then this should be documented somewhere or the Ant buil
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:00 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi Rémy,
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:58 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:10 PM wrote:
>>
>>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>>
>>> mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master
Hi everyone,
Shouldnt tomcat tool stay aligned on tomcat stack?
Maven shade or gradle fatjar plugins solve this issue with relocation for
all users and all namespaces so not a big deal to not handle more than
tomcat IMO, otherwise all hybrid cases (between ~servlet and ee) will be
broken IMHO.
L
Hi Rémy,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:58 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:10 PM wrote:
>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-jakart
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64225
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
At the moment, reg-name is further restricted to valid DNS names. What name
resolution service are you using?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64222
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64225
zhichun xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Parse the given input as an |An exception occurred while
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64221
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
51 matches
Mail list logo
