[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 --- Comment #10 from Tom --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #6) > This is mostly wontfix as I am certain the request of the reporter is that > secretRequired disables the need for the client to send the secret. > > 10.0.0-M2, 9.0.32,

Re: [tomcat] branch master updated: Update request start time using nanoTime

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:26 PM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Rémy, > > On 2/27/20 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Rémy, > > > > On 2/27/20 10:49, r...@apache.org wrote: > >> This is an automated email from

Re: [tomcat] branch master updated: Update request start time using nanoTime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, Some interesting[1] reading: https://steveloughran.blogspot.com/2015/09/time-on-multi-core-multi-sock et-servers.html - -chris [1] For some definitions of "interesting" On 2/27/20 17:26, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Rémy, > > On 2/27/20 17:

Re: [tomcat] branch master updated: Update request start time using nanoTime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rémy, On 2/27/20 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Rémy, > > On 2/27/20 10:49, r...@apache.org wrote: >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git >> repository. > >> remm pushed a commit to branch master in repository >> https://git

Re: [tomcat] branch master updated: Update request start time using nanoTime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rémy, On 2/27/20 10:49, r...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git > repository. > > remm pushed a commit to branch master in repository > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git > > > The following commi

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #6) > This is mostly wontfix as I am certain the request of the reporter is that > secretRequired disables the need for the client to send the secret. > > 10.

Re: Download stats

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Martin, On 2/27/20 02:59, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:40 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I took a look a the download stats from downloads.apache.org > . >

[Bug 56966] AccessLogValve's elapsed time has 15ms precision on Windows

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[tomcat] branch master updated: Update request start time using nanoTime

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 22ad695 Update request start time using nanoTime

[Bug 64182] 1.03s delay on every request via ajp

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182 --- Comment #4 from zac spitzer --- Ah, I think it might be an ipv4 vs ipv6 resolving issue. I had address"=127.0.0.1", I changed that to address="::f" and the delay went away -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[GitHub] [tomcat] hamza86 commented on issue #244: The '$' in the class name of Digester$EnvironmentPropertySource is no…

hamza86 commented on issue #244: The '$' in the class name of Digester$EnvironmentPropertySource is no… URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/244#issuecomment-591900457 I was trying to use this feature on Tomcat 9.x and from my experience, I found it briefly documented. This feature i

[Bug 64182] 1.03s delay on every request via ajp

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 --- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat --- After reading it, I agree. It's always possible to document things better :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas --- I agree the wording was correct but I had some text already committed locally to make it even more explicit so I push those changes it as they can't do any harm and may help as it is clear that some users wer

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Document secret / secretRequired more explicitly

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 86cb408 Document secret / secretRequired more expl

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Document secret / secretRequired more explicitly

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 85a0513 Document secret / secretRequired more expl

[tomcat] branch 7.0.x updated: Document secret / secretRequired more explicitly

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push: new 3695ce5 Document secret / secretRequired more expl

[tomcat] branch master updated: Document secret / secretRequired more explicitly

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new c467bd2 Document secret / secretRequired more ex

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[tomcat] branch 7.0.x updated: Ignore zero length secret

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push: new d1871be Ignore zero length secret d1871be is descri

[Bug 64182] 1.03s delay on every request via ajp

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182 --- Comment #2 from mgrigorov --- Hi Zac, Have you tried with plain Tomcat ? Without Lucee. If the problem is still there could you please share with us your configurations, both Tomcat's and HTTPD's, and the steps to reproduce it. -- You ar

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Ignore zero length secret

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new ac347fa Ignore zero length secret ac347fa is descri

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Ignore zero length secret

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new f30d7cd Ignore zero length secret f30d7cd is descri

[tomcat] branch master updated: Ignore zero length secret

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 260ee86 Ignore zero length secret 260ee86 is desc

[Bug 64182] 1.03s delay on every request via ajp

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182 zac spitzer changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from zac spitzer ---

[Bug 64182] New: 1.03s delay on every request via ajp

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182 Bug ID: 64182 Summary: 1.03s delay on every request via ajp Product: Tomcat 8 Version: 8.5.51 Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Re: Download stats

On 27/02/2020 07:59, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:40 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I took a look a the download stats from downloads.apache.org > . > > I didn't look at what was being

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 zac spitzer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zac.spit...@gmail.com -- You are receiv

[Bug 64180] secretRequred=false is ignored if secret=

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180 --- Comment #5 from mgrigorov --- (In reply to Tom from comment #4) > The proposed enhancement still does not address the ability to parametrize > the server.xml. > > Once the keyword secret= is there, it becomes mandatory even if it's "".

Re: Download stats

Hi, On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:40 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > I took a look a the download stats from downloads.apache.org. > > I didn't look at what was being downloaded (hashes, signatures or > releases). I just compared number of requests for each version over a 24 > hour period (yeste