Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2020/01/19]

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[GitHub] [tomcat] bkahlert edited a comment on issue #232: Fix handling of query parameters with no value, like `?foo`

2020-01-18 Thread GitBox
bkahlert edited a comment on issue #232: Fix handling of query parameters with no value, like `?foo` URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/232#issuecomment-575914702 I fear we won't make progress here. To anyone who suffers from the same problem (I spent hours with it), I have cr

[GitHub] [tomcat] bkahlert commented on issue #232: Fix handling of query parameters with no value, like `?foo`

2020-01-18 Thread GitBox
bkahlert commented on issue #232: Fix handling of query parameters with no value, like `?foo` URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/232#issuecomment-575914702 I fear we won't make progress here. To anyone who suffers from the same problem (I spent hours with it), I have created a

[Bug 64080] Graceful shutdown does not occur for connected clients that have not yet submitted their request payload

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080 --- Comment #10 from carbatt...@hotmail.com --- I understand the complexity. I look forward to seeing what you think is the way forward. If the conclusion is a 503, then I assume it is guaranteed that the request is not forwarded to the servle

[Bug 64080] Graceful shutdown does not occur for connected clients that have not yet submitted their request payload

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080 --- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas --- (In reply to carbattles from comment #8) > > 'allow requests to complete if > > possible' is a more invasive change and is not consistent with, > > historically, the behaviour Tomcat users have asked for on s

[Bug 64080] Graceful shutdown does not occur for connected clients that have not yet submitted their request payload

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080 --- Comment #8 from carbatt...@hotmail.com --- > 'allow requests to complete if > possible' is a more invasive change and is not consistent with, > historically, the behaviour Tomcat users have asked for on shutdown. Isn't this what unloadDela

[Bug 64080] Graceful shutdown does not occur for connected clients that have not yet submitted their request payload

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080 --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas --- I recommend folks take a look at bug 62515 and the associated commits before commenting further on this bug. It might save us all some time discussing what is and is not possible and what Tomcat currently doe

[Bug 64080] Graceful shutdown does not occur for connected clients that have not yet submitted their request payload

2020-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080 --- Comment #6 from carbatt...@hotmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #5) > (In reply to carbattles from comment #4) > > @Christopher Schultz In the previous bug 62515 I mentioned the first thing > > that should happen, wh