https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64051
Mohsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #11 from Mohsen ---
Thank yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #18)
> It is actually bin, because there is no distinction between bin and lib on
> Windows. It loads DLLs from the same directory as executables. This is wha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #18 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #17)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> > > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to carbattles from comment #4)
> @Christopher Schultz In the previous bug 62515 I mentioned the first thing
> that should happen, when a shutdown is requested, is that the port should be
> c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #16)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> > > My proposal would be platform-aware in Tomca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
--- Comment #4 from carbatt...@hotmail.com ---
@Christopher Schultz In the previous bug 62515 I mentioned the first thing that
should happen, when a shutdown is requested, is that the port should be closed,
so no more incoming requests are accep
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to carbattles from comment #2)
> In a perfect world, I'd like Tomcat to behave like an enterprise server, eg
> if it accepts a connection, it will process the request and submit the
> respon
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #16 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> > My proposal would be platform-aware in Tomcat 10 and 8.5 + 9 would support
> > both for a transition
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #14)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> > > My proposal would be platform-aware in Tomcat 10
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #14 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #13)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> > My proposal would be platform-aware in Tomcat 10 and 8.5 + 9 would support
> > both for a transition
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
simonsteiner1984 commented on issue #162: Add support for same-site cookie
attribute
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/162#issuecomment-575741548
For tomcat 7, best I could do was, which works in chrome and not firefox, is
there another way?
filterConfig.getServletContext().ge
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #12)
> My proposal would be platform-aware in Tomcat 10 and 8.5 + 9 would support
> both for a transition phase. Of course, this will require decent
> documen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Bug ID: 64084
Summary: "Unexpected query parameters [sort]"
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.32
Hardware: HP
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #3 from fuminz...@crd.com ---
Thought this might be one possibility of the verdict. :)
Still, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Alex Panchenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex.panche...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Bug ID: 64083
Summary: JDBC pool keeps closed connection as available
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Sev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
You are presenting what could be an issue in a complex and confusing IMO. So
let's start over.
The changes to isClosed is likely not relevant and this will not be changed.
They ensure that the socket wrap
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #1 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
For reference:
Tomcat 8.5.3 - 8.5.31 and 9.0.0 - 9.0.8:
...
@Override
public boolean isClosed()
{ return !getSocket().isOpen(); }
...
Tomcat 8.5.32 - 8.5.37 and 9.0.9 - 9.0.14
...
@Over
On 17/01/2020 14:25, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 1/16/20 8:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 16/01/2020 12:00, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
>>>
>>> --- Comment #13 from Sam ---
>
>> This idiot has been blocked from BZ for spam an
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
--- Comment #2 from carbatt...@hotmail.com ---
>Are you expecting Tomcat to process these requests normally (within some
>>configured timeout or set of timeouts for each stage) or is cleanly returning
>a >503 an acceptable response?
In a perf
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
Bug ID: 64082
Summary: Nio2Endpoint for async request doesn't clear
OutputBuffer when socket has already been closed
(response mixup)
Product: Tomcat 8
Version:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #12 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #10)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #7)
> > Apply POLA!
>
> The proper application of POLA is that Tomcat doesn't switch the location of
> these
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #11 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #10)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #7)
> > Apply POLA!
>
> The proper application of POLA is that Tomcat doesn't switch the location of
> these
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #7)
> Apply POLA!
The proper application of POLA is that Tomcat doesn't switch the location of
these files even across versions. I've lost track of the histo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 1/16/20 8:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/01/2020 12:00, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
>>
>> --- Comment #13 from Sam ---
>
> This idiot has been blocked from BZ for spam and the spa
Hi Mark,
*Per the JDK 14 schedule , we are now in Rampdown Phase Two
*
*Please advise if you have any open high priority issues.*
**
* The overall feature set is frozen.
o No further JEPs will be targeted to this release
o Per the JDK Release Process [1] we now turn our focus to P1
28 matches
Mail list logo
