Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2019/12/22]

2019-12-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: javax -> jakarta rename

2019-12-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/12/2019 17:45, Adam Rauch wrote: > Yes, I see that 9.x javax.* will be supported for a long time and I'm > all in favor of killing off deprecated EE libraries. I want to encourage > our users to migrate to Tomcat 10.x and future releases as quickly as > possible, but I'm concerned that 9.x

Re: javax -> jakarta rename

2019-12-21 Thread Adam Rauch
On 12/21/2019 3:11 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:36 AM Adam Rauch > wrote: I've watched with great interest the recent list discussions surrounding javax -> jakarta renaming and the draft release numbering plan. I'm curious: Would the

Re: javax -> jakarta rename

2019-12-21 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:36 AM Adam Rauch wrote: > I've watched with great interest the recent list discussions surrounding > javax -> jakarta renaming and the draft release numbering plan. I'm > curious: Would the Tomcat team consider making a Tomcat release that > supports BOTH the javax and j

Re: javax -> jakarta rename

2019-12-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Adam, Did you evaluate a class transformer added to tomcat classloader? This can stay quite light and enables the same while not using app loader - standard tomcat mode. For app loader case integrations can do the work easily (spring and friends) since they all have asm or equivalent. Hope it