Hi,
So I'm looking at random small items as possible cleanups and ... The
extras came up.
At some point (15 years ago) the idea was to have a smaller JAR and avoid
bloat, but right now I don't see the point of keeping them out of the
regular catalina.jar (and thus reduce the complexity of the bui
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60195
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov ---
Still true:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/tomcat-jdbc/8.5.35/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3957
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sch
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/136
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 9 10:37:10 2019
New Revision: 1850844
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850844&view=rev
Log:
Trivial reformatting to use camel case
Patch provided by yangli
This closes #136
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CoyoteAdapter.java
Modifi
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3956
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler schedu
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-85-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-85-trunk/builds/1601
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedul
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrik@gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 9 09:11:19 2019
New Revision: 1850831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850831&view=rev
Log:
Correct a regression in the fix for bug 53930 that prevented Tomcat from
working correctly with systemd.
Patch provided by Patrik S.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 9 09:07:08 2019
New Revision: 1850830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850830&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Correct a regression in the fix for bug 53930 that prevented Tomcat from
working correctly with systemd.
Patch pr
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 9 09:04:56 2019
New Revision: 1850829
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850829&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Correct a regression in the fix for bug 53930 that prevented Tomcat from
working correctly with systemd.
Patch pr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63063
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
The issue isn't obvious but is observable on Ubuntu.
I agree that "\&" -> to "\&\&" is the correct fix. I'll get that implemented
and back-ported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63049
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
dev@ list thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8317a1a0d12b48b5746ee8e9e2eded1c00a0b458d3ecbc585c914f2b@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
15 matches
Mail list logo
