Author: violetagg
Date: Wed Sep 14 06:37:13 2016
New Revision: 1760640
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1760640&view=rev
Log:
Format the code. No functional changes.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/digester/Digester.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/u
On 13/09/2016 22:28, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue Sep 13 21:28:54 2016
> New Revision: 1760598
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1760598&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix BZ 59164. Avoid crash during logging of failure to resolve worker host
> name.
C not being my strong point
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: markt
Date: Tue Sep 13 21:28:54 2016
New Revision: 1760598
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1760598&view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 59164. Avoid crash during logging of failure to resolve worker host name.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_connect.c
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscel
On 13/09/2016 17:24, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are places in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester that do not
> consider useContextClassLoader.
> I would like to ask whether this is intentional or I can change that and
> use the provided classloader when useContextClassLoader is
Hi,
2016-08-30 15:35 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-08-24 16:44 GMT+03:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently it is not possible to use
ServletInputStream.read/ServletOutputStream.write methods with ByteBuffer.
To enable such scenarios in Tomcat I would like to extend
Hi,
There are places in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester that do not
consider useContextClassLoader.
I would like to ask whether this is intentional or I can change that and
use the provided classloader when useContextClassLoader is false.
Thanks a lot,
Violeta
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
What actaully matters is the size of the .class file. That has to conform to
the JVM specification. There are various limits there although the method size
one is the one folks tend to hit first.
It should b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #2 from Björn Mahler ---
Okay - so how do we know that we are close to the limit - what kind of limits
in our JSP do we have to consider and how can we avoid that?
But I'll check what you suggested... thanks for the quick answer.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
Bug ID: 60126
Summary: The code of method invoke0(JspWriter) is exceeding the
65535 bytes limit
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.37
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Are those rquests coming from valid clients? (Is value of user-agent header as
expected? Note that it can be logged with %{User-Agent}i)
Maybe some bot is reading your access logs and tries URLs that
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
All,
It has been over 12 months since the 1.2.41 release and the changelog
contains some important fixes. I think it is time to start thinking
about a 1.2.42 release.
I took a first pass through the open bug reports yesterday and resolved
the really obvious / simple ones. Any help with the remain
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
Good question. It has been over a year since the last release. I'll start a
discussion on the dev list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks for confirming the fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
--- Comment #8 from Christian Swoboda ---
GREAT!
Will there be an official release of 1.2.42 soon?
Thanks a lot
swobi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
17 matches
Mail list logo