2016-01-11 10:03 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to drop Itanium support in the windows binaries, we have
> dropped it in native 1.1.34 so we can't have a complete Itanium in
> Tomcat 6.0.45.
+1.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
Hi,
I would like to drop Itanium support in the windows binaries, we have
dropped it in native 1.1.34 so we can't have a complete Itanium in
Tomcat 6.0.45.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-apr has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sun Jan 10 23:41:28 2016
New Revision: 1723971
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1723971&view=rev
Log:
Fix Apache Ant version typo in building.html
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/building.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/building.xml
URL
On 10/01/2016 16:39, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 11:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 08/01/2016 14:21, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>
>> I'm working on some session stuff that reall
On 01/08/2016 07:27 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2016-01-08 17:21 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>
> 1) A bug in a new feature:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58817
>
> I plan to look there togethe
On 01/08/2016 11:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 14:21, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to test and tag tomcat 6.0.45 during the week-end.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I'm working on some session stuff that really should be in the next 6
> release. I don't think it wil
All,
I've been lazily looking at this issue on SO:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33688020
I haven't independently verified that Tomcat (or the JRE, more likely)
validates expired certificates but I can see arguments in favor of both
behaviors:
1. If the client cert (not an intermediate) is