https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57601
Bug ID: 57601
Summary: DefaultServlet returns no content when included during
a HEAD request
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: All
Hi Mark,
Below are my observations during my research on the bug:
1) I downloaded recent trunk and ran the ant command so that the
build/bin/lib folders are generated.
2) I created a simple web application and exported to WAR file which is of
3.4 MB size including 10 required jar files.
3) I ena
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Feb 19 04:30:33 2015
New Revision: 1660793
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660793
Log:
Simplify code in ProtectedFunctionMapper class of Jasper runtime.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Fixed in Tomcat 6 by r1660792.
The fix will be in 6.0.44 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Feb 19 04:19:11 2015
New Revision: 1660792
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660792
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581
Change statistics byte counter in coyote Request object to be long to
allow values above 2Gb. (RequestInfo.getRequestBytesRece
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Feb 19 04:07:52 2015
New Revision: 1660788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660788
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
Add missing JARs in Ant task definition. Expand the pattern in
catalina-tasks.xml to include all jars in ${catalina.home}/lib.
2015-02-18 1:24 GMT+09:00 Jeremy Boynes :
> Ping?
>
> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> > Please could we have a third set of eyes on this release.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jeremy
> >
> >> On Feb 10, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >>
> >> The proposed Apache Taglibs 1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Feb 18 21:58:05 2015
New Revision: 1660738
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660738
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344
Provide sha1 checksum files for Tomcat downloads.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/dist
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57559
--- Comment #3 from cg.throwa...@mailinator.com ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #2)
> Previous discussion of this issue, ~8 months ago (June 2014):
>
> "Decoded URL set on asynchronous request"
> http://tomcat.markmail.org/thre
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Jung ---
Some attributes are "known" in the AJP 1.3 protocol and their names are
marshalled on the wire with hex abbreviations. Those must be known by the
receiver as well otherwise it is a protocol violation. So new
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Schultz ---
I have a question about your implementation in mod_jk: why are you passing the
SSL_PROTOCOL as a "SC_A_REQ_ATTRIBUTE" instead of a first-class piece of
information, like SC_A_SSL_CIPHER is done?
Wou
On 18/02/2015 15:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2015 14:01, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2015-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> Hmm. I've been running a test with this plus a bunch of possibly
>>> unnecessary sync expansions looping over the suspect test for over an
>>> hour now without any
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 18 16:59:09 2015
New Revision: 1660677
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660677
Log:
Ensure correct props are set on cgi files
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-70.cgi (props changed)
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-80.cgi (props changed)
tomcat/site
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Jung ---
Comment on attachment 32493
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32493
Updated patch
The part for java/org/apache/coyote/ajp looks fine to me.
The rest also, but I didn't inspect it very t
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 3:10 AM, Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Konstantin, Jeremy,
>
> Yes I can provide a simple example shortly...
>
> Apologies for breaking the first rule of questioning: provide all details
> about operating system, container, libraries, etc.
>
> Would i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466
Jeremy Boynes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Version|unspecifie
On 18/02/2015 14:01, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> Hmm. I've been running a test with this plus a bunch of possibly
>> unnecessary sync expansions looping over the suspect test for over an
>> hour now without any failures.
>>
>> This patch does fix a logic p
2015-02-17 16:49 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 16/02/2015 14:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2015-02-15 21:46 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.20 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>>
>>> The proposed 8.0.20 release is:
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Stable
Mark,
On 2/15/15 1:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.20 release is now available for voting.
>
> The main changes since 8.0.18 are:
> - Fix a performance regression in the new resources implementation
> when signed JARs are used in a web application.
> - Fix several bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #9 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32496
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32496&action=edit
hs_err_pid3936.log - Tomcat 9 @1660633 - Crash Log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32495
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32495&action=edit
catalina.2015-02-18.log - Tomcat 9 @1660633 - Log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32494
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32494&action=edit
localhost_access_log.2015-02-18.txt - Tomcat 9 @1660633 - Access Log
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32486|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32487|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #6 from Konstanti
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Schultz ---
I've got an updated patch with AJP support that I'm testing now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
2015-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> Hmm. I've been running a test with this plus a bunch of possibly
> unnecessary sync expansions looping over the suspect test for over an
> hour now without any failures.
>
> This patch does fix a logic problem but I thought it was one that would
> result
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32492
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32492&action=edit
catalina.2015-02-18.log - Log - 8.0.18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32491
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32491&action=edit
localhost_access_log.2015-02-18.txt - Access Log - 8.0.18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32490
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32490&action=edit
catalina.2015-02-18.log - Log - 8.0.20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32489
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32489&action=edit
localhost_access_log.2015-02-18.txt - Access Log - 8.0.20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 32488
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32488&action=edit
server.xml
server.xml - Tomcat 8.0.20.
Custom configuration of Connectors (different port numbers and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
Bug ID: 57592
Summary: numberwriter example: Response status 500,
asyncOperation() not valid for request with state
DISPATCHED
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.18
On 18/02/2015 12:14, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Feb 18 12:14:24 2015
> New Revision: 1660609
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660609
> Log:
> registered is guarded by registeredLock so there is no need for it to be
> volatile.
> Simplify the process of triggering the firs
2015-02-18 15:56 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2015-02-17 16:49 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/02/2015 14:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2015-02-15 21:46 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.20 release is now available for voting.
The proposed 8.0.20 re
2015-02-17 16:49 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 16/02/2015 14:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2015-02-15 21:46 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.20 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>>
>>> The proposed 8.0.20 release is:
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Stable
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 18 12:53:44 2015
New Revision: 1660618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660618
Log:
Handle the unlikely case of setting the write listener from a non-container
thread.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/upgrade/UpgradeServletOutputStream.java
Modif
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 18 12:14:24 2015
New Revision: 1660609
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660609
Log:
registered is guarded by registeredLock so there is no need for it to be
volatile.
Simplify the process of triggering the first call to onWritePossible
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 18 12:07:32 2015
New Revision: 1660608
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660608
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/or
Hi Konstantin, Jeremy,
Yes I can provide a simple example shortly...
Apologies for breaking the first rule of questioning: provide all
details about operating system, container, libraries, etc.
Would it be best if I continue this discussion here or at Jira?
On 17-02-15 17:23, Jeremy Boynes
2015-02-18 10:45 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2015 09:25, r...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: remm
> > Date: Wed Feb 18 09:25:30 2015
> > New Revision: 1660582
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660582
> > Log:
> > - Add debugging of my own (sorry), on socket close.
> > - Try dropping the d
On 18/02/2015 09:47, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-02-18 10:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>> I'm fairly confident that the problem we are seeing with
>> TestWebSocketFrameClientSSL is related to a write registration not
>> happening / getting lost. The symptom is that the server just stops
>> writin
2015-02-18 10:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> I'm fairly confident that the problem we are seeing with
> TestWebSocketFrameClientSSL is related to a write registration not
> happening / getting lost. The symptom is that the server just stops
> writing, the client times out after 60s and the test fai
On 18/02/2015 09:25, r...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: remm
> Date: Wed Feb 18 09:25:30 2015
> New Revision: 1660582
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660582
> Log:
> - Add debugging of my own (sorry), on socket close.
> - Try dropping the direct socket close from the upgraded streams (the sockets
On 18/02/2015 09:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-02-17 22:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> On 17/02/2015 21:02, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Tue Feb 17 21:02:09 2015
>>> New Revision: 1660498
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660498
>>> Log:
>>> Possible fix for occasiona
Author: remm
Date: Wed Feb 18 09:25:30 2015
New Revision: 1660582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660582
Log:
- Add debugging of my own (sorry), on socket close.
- Try dropping the direct socket close from the upgraded streams (the sockets
seem to still be closed and the ws tests pass with NIO1+2).
2015-02-17 22:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 17/02/2015 21:02, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: markt
> > Date: Tue Feb 17 21:02:09 2015
> > New Revision: 1660498
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660498
> > Log:
> > Possible fix for occasional NIO2 CI failures. Without the sync it is
> pos
rkspace/junit/target/junit-4.13-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dobjenesis.jar=/srv/gump/public/workspace/objenesis/main/target/objenesis-2.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Dtest.reports=output/logs-NIO2
-Dtomcat-native.tar.gz=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20150218-native-src.tar.gz
-Dexampl
On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
>>
>> 2015-02-14 20:04 GMT+03:00 Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST)
>> :
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I have a question about this issue:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
51 matches
Mail list logo
