https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Chen ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> Yes, those diagrams are out of date.
>
> The problem is bigger than you have identified. Page 2 is completely wrong.
> The call sequence is very different.
H
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #1)
> I see 1ms precision when running on Windows 7. I see 1ms running on Linux.
> The last time when I observed 10ms was Windows XP, but Windows XP is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
I can confirm that the proposed fix works. I'll commit it once the svn server
comes back to life.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Trivial test case to reproduce:
https://github.com/markt-asf/tomcat-bug57281
I'm moving on to testing the proposed fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57265
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Just to confirm my reading of the stacktrace, you are using Sendfile with SSL,
right?
Is that is the case, are you sure using Sendfile is providing any benefit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
Oleg Trokhov changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Trokho
