https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Koh ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> The JSP servlet is not designed to support more than one instance per web
> application. Before this gets resolved as invalid (possibly with an update
> to the d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
--- Comment #5 from jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com ---
I went ahead and downloaded MS Visual Studio Express today in hopes of trying
to do my own build based on Mladen's instructions in Bug 56363.
Unfortunately, I'm juggling a half-dozen other
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Abdul Wahid from comment #4)
You are asking on a different topic. Your question cannot be answered here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Klemen Novak from comment #3)
> Is there anyone working on this problem?
One person, and it looks that it is not going very well.
The progress is discussed in issue 56363 and on dev
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Bug ID: 56673
Summary: Tomcat Websocket 8.0.8 Java Standalone Client
Session.getId() returns "0"
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.8
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
On 25/06/2014 20:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-06-25 23:11 GMT+04:00 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Jun 25 19:11:03 2014
>> New Revision: 1605561
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605561
>> Log:
>> Add the initial hooks to get the Windows binaries signed by Symantec's code
>> signing ser
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #11)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
>
> I think e) is not possible, because Eclipse uses a different license.
The license looks OK as long as w
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
--- Comment #3 from Klemen Novak ---
Is there anyone working on this problem? Please fix the issue as soon as
possible.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
I tested TCN 1_1_30 with Tomcat 6 (which our app uses) and everything appears
to work just fine. I haven't updated our install to try working with Tomcat 7.
This is on a CentOS 6.5 (yum updated) box with fips mode enabled at boot, and
a server.xml similar to yours.
Just looking quickly at y
2014-06-25 23:11 GMT+04:00 :
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jun 25 19:11:03 2014
> New Revision: 1605561
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605561
> Log:
> Add the initial hooks to get the Windows binaries signed by Symantec's code
> signing service. This work is still at the evaluation stage.
>
> Add
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
--- Comment #11 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
I think e) is not possible, because Eclipse uses a different license.
An additional idea:
g) Remove that dependency. (At least mark it optional).
Firs
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 19:11:03 2014
New Revision: 1605561
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605561
Log:
Add the initial hooks to get the Windows binaries signed by Symantec's code
signing service. This work is still at the evaluation stage.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/buil
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
Author: violetagg
Date: Wed Jun 25 18:14:35 2014
New Revision: 1605534
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605534
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543
Merged revision 1605528 from tomcat/trunk:
Update to the Eclipse JDT Compiler 4.4
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (pro
Author: violetagg
Date: Wed Jun 25 18:02:49 2014
New Revision: 1605528
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605528
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543
Update to the Eclipse JDT Compiler 4.4
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/trunk/res/ide-support/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56027
Simon Mijolovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smijolo...@nutanix.com
--
You a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56027
Simon Mijolovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Version|1.1.
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 15:52:29 2014
New Revision: 1605454
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605454
Log:
Handle preference selection for multiple extension headers with the same name
Tighten up parameter validation for permessage-deflate
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/websoc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
--- Comment #2 from jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com ---
This is CVE-2014-0224.
It's caused my rating on Qualys SSL test to drop from an A+ to an F.
Is there any way to mitigate the vulnerability?
Mladen? Any chance you could roll us out a new v
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 15:25:09 2014
New Revision: 1605449
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605449
Log:
Update docs for 8.0.9 release
[This commit notification would consist of 251 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
-
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/157
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Sou
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Bug ID: 56672
Summary: Error 503 while restarting any Tomcat node (load
balanced)
Product: Tomcat Connectors
Version: 1.2.40
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
2014-06-24 20:02 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> Wonder what people's thoughts are about possibly including TomEE releases
> in the Tomcat news feed on occasion?
>
> Having some mention of TomEE on tomcat.apache.org would be nice -- most
> users still do not know it exists. However, I've never mentio
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 14:43:59 2014
New Revision: 5674
Log:
Drop the 8.0.8 release
Removed:
release/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.8/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 14:43:12 2014
New Revision: 1605427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605427
Log:
Update for 8.0.9 release (excluding docs)
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-80.html
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
--- Comment #4 from Abdul Wahid ---
Hi Konstantin,
I am getting permission issue only for tomcat service while installing TOMCAT 7
on windows 2000 server.
I logged into the server with Administrator privileges.
Please update with your fe
David,
On 6/24/14, 2:02 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Wonder what people's thoughts are about possibly including TomEE releases in
> the Tomcat news feed on occasion?
>
> Having some mention of TomEE on tomcat.apache.org would be nice -- most users
> still do not know it exists. However, I've nev
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
Martin Schelldorfer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schelldor...@gmail.com
--
Y
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
I have nothing against doing e), no problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsub
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 14:24:48 2014
New Revision: 1605418
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605418
Log:
whitespace
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
Modified: tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?rev=1605418&r1=1605417&r2=1605418&vie
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 14:20:05 2014
New Revision: 1605417
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605417
Log:
Fix copy/paste error in r1605054
Control messages should be read into the control message buffer
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/WsFrameBase.java
Modified: tomc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #8)
> I'd vote c), then e). If Eclipse delays its releases by a couple weeks, it
> shouldn't be the end of the world if Tomcat does the same thing, right ?
The de
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
Author: violetagg
Date: Wed Jun 25 13:54:01 2014
New Revision: 1605405
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605405
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Merged revision 1605402 from tomcat/trunk:
Correct the generation of the effective web.xml when elements contain an empty
st
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat ---
I'd vote c), then e). If Eclipse delays its releases by a couple weeks, it
shouldn't be the end of the world if Tomcat does the same thing, right ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
Author: violetagg
Date: Wed Jun 25 13:48:17 2014
New Revision: 1605402
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605402
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Correct the generation of the effective web.xml when elements contain an empty
string as value.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56668
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
2014-06-24 22:02 GMT+04:00 David Blevins :
> Wonder what people's thoughts are about possibly including TomEE releases in
> the Tomcat news feed on occasion?
>
> Having some mention of TomEE on tomcat.apache.org would be nice -- most users
> still do not know it exists. However, I've never mentio
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(The specific change mentioned here is r1595690 changing return type
s/void/boolean/)
3. This kind of a signature change cannot be reverted in a forward-compatible
way. Tomcat 8.0.9 has already be
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 25 08:48:32 2014
New Revision: 1605293
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1605293
Log:
Update the API stability section of the release notes now that Tomcat 8 has had
its first stable release.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.x
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 24/06/14 20:02, David Blevins wrote:
Wonder what people's thoughts are about possibly including TomEE releases in
the Tomcat news feed on occasion?
Having some mention of TomEE on tomcat.apache.org would be nice -- most users
still do not know it exists. However, I've never mentioned it as
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50604
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david_s...@hotmail.com
--- Com
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Bug ID: 56670
Summary: Tomcat 8.0.9 embedded poms on Maven Central include
dependency on ecj version that isn't resolvable
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Bug ID: 56669
Summary: StandardContext.loadOnStartup() changed its signature
in 8.0.9
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
49 matches
Mail list logo
