Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2012-12-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > > The proposal would be to move "storeconfig7/trunk" from the sandbox to > > "modules/storeconfig" in the Tomcat 7 branch [a port to trunk, aka > > Tomcat "8", would be coming shortly, since I believe its container API > > would now start to b

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/12/2012 13:36, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I would be willing to start maintaining again storeconfig, along with > Jean-Frédéric. Nice. That is a really useful feature. Great to see it (and you) back. > So after a hiatus, we would be able to bring back this > functionality which allows

[Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2012-12-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I would be willing to start maintaining again storeconfig, along with Jean-Frédéric. So after a hiatus, we would be able to bring back this functionality which allows tweaking the configuration (through JMX in particular) and then saving it to server.xml and context.xml files to make changes s

Re: Contributing an authenticator - core vs extras

2012-12-14 Thread Toby Hobson
Hi Mark Thanks for your quick response, I will do as you suggest Toby On 14 December 2012 09:51, Mark Thomas wrote: > Toby, > > Thanks for your mail. > > There are no hard and fast rules. The recommended destination depends on a > number of factors: > - amount of code > - degree of demand for

Re: Contributing an authenticator - core vs extras

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Toby, Thanks for your mail. There are no hard and fast rules. The recommended destination depends on a number of factors: - amount of code - degree of demand for the feature - license - dependencies I'd suggest creating a Bugzilla entry and attach your patch for review. Mark Toby Hobson wrot