https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54068
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 54068
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: Web fragment sorting incorrectly detects circular
reference
Severity: normal
Classification: Unc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks. Much more readable.
I'm currently mulling over how to handle this. The HttpParser is very
heavy-weight but the simple approach is demonstrably prone to failure. I'm
wondering if writing a generic
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3511
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source St
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
--- Comment #2 from Joakim Erdfelt ---
Good call on RFC-2616 Section 4.4, some of us suspected something wrong on our
handling of upgrade (from a client point of view) as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:53:56 2012
New Revision: 1403471
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403471&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
1xx response codes do not have an entity body.
Prior to this fix 101 responses (HTTP upgrade) included "Transf
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:47:26 2012
New Revision: 1403468
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403468&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
1xx response codes do not have an entity body.
Prior to this fix 101 responses (HTTP upgrade) included "Transf
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
This is certainly a Tomcat bug in that the header should not be sent. It could
also be argued that the Jetty client should ignore it based on point 1 of
section 4.4 of RFC 2616.
I'll take a look at a fix
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54065
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thornton ---
Created attachment 29519
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29519&action=edit
Patch in alternative format
I hope this the preferred format
result of git diff -p
--
You are rec
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 54067
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: Upgrade Response with Transfer-Encoding: chunked
invalid
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
diff -u format for the patch please. I'm tempted to use the HTTP header parser
for this. It'll need a fair bit of work for this though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064
--- Comment #2 from dragos cernahoschi ---
Yes, I'll verify it the next day(s) after you apply the fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
Mark Thornton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mthorn...@optrak.com
--
You are r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thornton ---
The patch is against 7.0.30 because that is the most recent version packaged
for Ubuntu 12.10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thornton ---
Created attachment 29518
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29518&action=edit
Proposed patch fixes problem
A more rigorous parsing of header lines might be appropriate
--
You
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community
integration.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54065
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 54065
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: getResource with WARDirContext is very expensive
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
Reporter: s
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
--- Comment #23 from Tino Kissig ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Wicket has a fix in versions 1.5.9 (not released yet) and 6.1.0.
> Which version do you use ?
Unfortunately we still use 1.4.18 and don't have the resources yet to upgrade
to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
--- Comment #22 from mgrigorov ---
Wicket has a fix in versions 1.5.9 (not released yet) and 6.1.0.
Which version do you use ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
Tino Kissig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tino.kis...@exedio.com
--
You are r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
--- Comment #21 from Tino Kissig ---
At our current system we're getting the IllegalArgumentException when Tomcat
tries to normalize such a relative url for a redirect.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
at org.apache.catalina.connecto
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064
--- Comment #1 from Mladen Turk ---
Yes, we had similar issue on users list but was not entered into BZ cause
reporter could not figure out the reason. I think I know what might be the
issue, so it would be great if you can verify the fix (
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 54064
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: tomcat native randomly very slow with high CPU usage
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
O
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Oct 29 10:34:42 2012
New Revision: 1403246
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403246&view=rev
Log:
last project info report plugin
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/mav
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thornton ---
The current parsing would also be broken by including an embedded quote in
fields (e.g. in the cnonce field). E.g. cnonce="Mgytrr\"gfh"
Looking for a regular expression that correctly handles this synt
26 matches
Mail list logo
