To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-validate has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Author: timw
Date: Fri Jul 27 02:16:57 2012
New Revision: 1366267
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1366267&view=rev
Log:
Add --disable-sock-cloexec flag to configure that supresses use of SOCK_CLOEXEC
so built modules will work on Linux kernels < 2.6.27.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-validate-eoln has an issue affecting its community
integrati
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #4 from F.Arnoud ---
You're right, only one access to get() for WeakReference (and brother classes).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53607
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: No message set for PING: TcpPingInterceptor fail with
NullPointerException in
ChannelData.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #3 from Sebb ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I used this solution:
>
> protected void sendPing() {
> TcpFailureDetector tcpFailureDetector = failureDetector!=null ?
> failureDetector.get() : null;
> if (tcpFa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #2 from F.Arnoud ---
I used this solution:
protected void sendPing() {
TcpFailureDetector tcpFailureDetector = failureDetector!=null ?
failureDetector.get() : null;
if (tcpFailureDetector!=null) {
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
F.Arnoud changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from F.Arnoud ---
S
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53606
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: NullPointerException in TcpPingInterceptor
Severity: blocker
Classification: Unclassified
Reporter: freder
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-validate has an issue affecting its community
integration.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
--- Comment #15 from papegaaij ---
Ok, things are getting more clear to me now. Isn't it better to assume that
relative URLs always fall within the webapplication? The worst thing that could
happen, is that a jsessionid gets appended where
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
--- Comment #3 from Julian Reschke ---
Wait.
Why add a status code that hasn't been approved yet?
The spec might go nowhere. Or it might be approved, but with a different status
code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
15 matches
Mail list logo
