To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
2012/5/28 Keiichi Fujino :
> Thanks for the review.
> I fixed it.
>
> I implemented the calculation method of host's default config path to
> Host(StanderdHost).
> just like a Host#getAppBaseFile().
> This fix is applied only to trunk.
>
> If there is a different implementation idea, feel free to r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53359
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: Request for or as element inside
Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52723
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to comment #5)
1. BufferedOutputStream does not deserve closing, because it is in memory only.
No native resources are leaking.
- ObjectOutputStream would never need to be closed. If an
2012/6/4 Mark Thomas :
> On 03/06/2012 23:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>>> Does something guarantee that there is always common type among
>>> injection targets?
>>>
>>> Can there be two disjoint interfaces A and B, which are both
>>> implemented by a resource, so assign
2012/6/5 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>
>> For that reason, I'd like us to be more conscious about our commits on v7
>> and start looking at v7 as bug fixes and stabilization as the primary
>> drivers for commits.
>
> Stabilization usually means that we stop fixing bugs in "stable"
> version besides eas
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Not fixed yet but as an aside you'll need to use
not ""
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/623
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Sou
2012/6/4 Filip Hanik (mailing lists) :
>
> Ok, this is back to code discipline. At some point, we'd have to expect that
> more users will adopt v7 in production (I'm still seeing 80%+ being on v6),
> at that point, commits like this do nothing except pollute the diffs.
>
There were two fixes in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337
--- Comment #7 from rstoyanc...@yahoo.com ---
Thanks for the suggestions, Mark.
In the discussion on the servlet-spec user list, even wider implications were
mentioned including avoiding reliance on the requestURI or even the session
from a
On 03/06/2012 23:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> Does something guarantee that there is always common type among
>> injection targets?
>>
>> Can there be two disjoint interfaces A and B, which are both
>> implemented by a resource, so assignment to A or B should succeed,
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:40:06 2012
New Revision: 1346109
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346109&view=rev
Log:
Rework fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/cat
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:38:00 2012
New Revision: 1346107
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346107&view=rev
Log:
Rework fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/NamingResources.java
Modified: tomcat/
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 12:41 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1345848 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./
> java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/NamingResources.java
> java/org/apache/tomcat/util/ne
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53356
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: Mapping a servlet to the application's context root
results in IAE
Severity: normal
Classificat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Hollencamp updated MTOMCAT-159:
--
Attachment: MTOMCAT-159-1.diff
implementation
> WAR dependencies extr
Robert Hollencamp created MTOMCAT-159:
-
Summary: WAR dependencies extracted every run
Key: MTOMCAT-159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-159
Project: Apache Tomcat Maven Plugin
On 04/06/2012 17:05, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>
> Ok, this is back to code discipline. At some point, we'd have to
> expect that more users will adopt v7 in production (I'm still seeing
> 80%+ being on v6), at that point, commits like this do nothing except
> pollute the diffs.
It depen
Ok, this is back to code discipline. At some point, we'd have to expect that
more users will adopt v7 in production (I'm still seeing 80%+ being on v6), at
that point, commits like this do nothing except pollute the diffs.
Servlet 3.1 has released a draft, where I'd expect that trunk is headed.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52723
--- Comment #5 from liangg...@sei.pku.edu.cn ---
Hi, Konstantin, can you explain more about your new comment (Comment 4)?
Does the BufferedOutputStream temp object need to be closed in this code piece?
--
You are receiving this mail becau
2012/6/4 Mark Thomas :
> On 04/06/2012 07:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/5/8 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Tue May 8 19:07:09 2012
>>> New Revision: 1335700
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1335700&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> It appears that pausing requests for a Context during rel
On 04/06/2012 07:41, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/5/30 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed May 30 13:35:55 2012
>> New Revision: 1344253
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1344253&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
>> Make sure the buffer is c
On 04/06/2012 07:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/5/8 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Tue May 8 19:07:09 2012
>> New Revision: 1335700
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1335700&view=rev
>> Log:
>> It appears that pausing requests for a Context during reload was relying on
>> the mapper
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38774
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to comment #3)
If you do care, you should open a new bug report and provide enough details to
reproduce the issue. Commenting on a 6-year old issue is wrong. A lot has
changed.
Do not fo
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jun 4 07:27:46 2012
New Revision: 1345848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345848&view=rev
Log:
Merged revision 1345846 from tomcat/trunk:
Code formatting (indents). No functional change.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/tr
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jun 4 07:24:02 2012
New Revision: 1345846
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345846&view=rev
Log:
Code formatting (indents). No functional change.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/NamingResources.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomca
29 matches
Mail list logo
