On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:06 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
>> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
>> of tomcat svn and puts it in an appropriately struct
On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
(for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
coming weekend ;)
+1 for middle of next
Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>i needed to dig into tomcat for some bugs regarding TCKs. That's why i
>needed more.
>
>- Romain
What did you need that the published JARs and source JARs didn't give you?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 12/19/2011 09:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
because developers can't know both?
Since it seems you are familiar with maven, what is your
opinion about maven ant tasks?
Seems to me it offers full power of Ant, almost seamless
transition, with the option to use maven deploy and dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172984#comment-13172984
]
Björn Michael commented on MTOMCAT-92:
--
Right. I currently use it in conjunction with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172972#comment-13172972
]
Morten Haraldsen commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
Yes, but I think you should probably
Hi ,
Greetings for the day.
I've a question about using the tomcat as a TCP server. Given that tomcat
uses basic TCPConnections how can we use it as TCP server?Are there some
settings we need to turn on or given we already have our TCPClient how
tomcat will be able to receive data from a port whi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Thanks for your brevity, Mark
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/12/2011 18:47, David Jencks wrote:
>> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
>> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
>> of tomcat svn and puts it in
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2577
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source St
On 19.12.2011 22:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
(for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
coming weekend ;)
All: If we can get some mo
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Dec 20 00:38:55 2011
New Revision: 1221050
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221050&view=rev
Log:
Clean up handling multi-byte chars in the connectors.
Backport of r1201069+1201087 from trunk
resp. r1201076+r1201088 from TC7 and r1201452 from TC6.
Modified:
tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52366
Rainer Jung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Dec 20 00:24:04 2011
New Revision: 1221043
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221043&view=rev
Log:
BZ 52366: Fix typo in VirtualWebappLoader
documentation (configuration example).
Backport of r1221038 from trunk.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172772#comment-13172772
]
Hudson commented on MTOMCAT-108:
Integrated in TomcatMavenPlugin #75 (See
[https://build
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Dec 20 00:18:30 2011
New Revision: 1221038
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221038&view=rev
Log:
BZ 52366: Fix typo in VirualWebappLoader
documentation (configuration example).
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/loader.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172767#comment-13172767
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-104:
--
some fixes has been committed do you still h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-62.
---
Resolution: Fixed
tomcat7 is now supported with tomcat7:run
> Support Tomcat 7
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172765#comment-13172765
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-92:
-
in tomcat run plugin ?
> Bind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-102.
Resolution: Fixed
done
> Add a mojo to build a standalone jar to run a web applic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-85.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed with integration of a console progress output.
> Perfoming t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172760#comment-13172760
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-105:
--
any way you provide a sample project to repr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-108.
Resolution: Fixed
applied.
SNAPSHOT will deployed by jenkins build.
Reopen if any issues.
Thanks f
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 19 23:50:50 2011
New Revision: 1221023
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221023&view=rev
Log:
[MTOMCAT-108] The httpsPort flag starts another http thread not an https thread
Submitted by Brad Giaccio.
Added:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-war-runner/src/ma
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 19 23:50:35 2011
New Revision: 1221022
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221022&view=rev
Log:
ensure we correctly start https connector with tomcat*:run
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven/plugin/tomc
i needed to dig into tomcat for some bugs regarding TCKs. That's why i
needed more.
- Romain
2011/12/19 jean-frederic clere
> On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
>> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls
All,
I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
(for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
coming weekend ;)
All: If we can get some more votes for the remaining issues I'll try
Author: markt
Date: Mon Dec 19 21:36:54 2011
New Revision: 1220959
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220959&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomca
On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
of tomcat svn and puts it in an appropriately structured maven
mutli-project build and we've been re-releasing quite a
On 12/19/2011 09:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I don't know if it is because i used more maven than ant but when i checked
out tomcat the first time i wondered where was modules (corresponding to
jars).
OK, this is the first thing I can agree with you. But It has nothing
to do with toolkit
because developers can't know both?
we use both on OpenEJB (ok the ant part is small but it is used through the
maven plugin).
I don't know if it is because i used more maven than ant but when i checked
out tomcat the first time i wondered where was modules (corresponding to
jars). I was doing th
On 12/19/2011 08:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
There is a big part of tomcat which doesn't need maven because it doesn't
need to be standard (the installers are a great example).
Installer is just ant exec task with some filtering
for getting the versions correctly.
We have multiple release
On 19/12/2011 09:42, Henri Gomez wrote:
> There is many reasons to use Maven instead of Ant :
>
> * Better startup bootstrap for new comers, mvn package won't require
> hack in build.properties, it just works out of the box.
No it won't. At least not until Eclipse publish the JDT complier JAR to
There is a big part of tomcat which doesn't need maven because it doesn't
need to be standard (the installers are a great example).
I spoke about the common part which is today not obvious because of the
false modularity of the project.
- Romain
2011/12/19 Mladen Turk
> On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM
> Here we speak that we should replace entire Tomcat
> build system with maven, meaning, multiple arches, creating
> windows installer, etc. I don't see any of those in Geronimo.
Why no do it step by step and produce with Maven what's produced today by Ant ?
> All I'm saying, if you can do it, yo
On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has been maintaining a
script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out of tomcat svn and puts it in an
appropriately structured maven mutli-project build and we've been re-releasing quite
Hi,
i agree on the fact maven is technically more complicated than an ant
script but let say you know both maven and ant, your ant script is very
complicated to do almost nothing useful. (ok i prefer maven ;)).
For newcomers i think it is important. Maven stuff can be almost hidden by
a good IDE,
On 19/12/2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>> Ok, let's do it again :-D
>>> 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
>>> structure. The source should go into src/main/java, the resources in
>>
On 19/12/2011 18:47, David Jencks wrote:
> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
> of tomcat svn and puts it in an appropriately structured maven
> mutli-project build and we've been re-releasing quite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brad Giaccio updated MTOMCAT-108:
-
Attachment: https.patch
1. Cleaned up formatting
2. Added a @see to PaswordUtil pointing back t
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has been
maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out of tomcat svn
and puts it in an appropriately structured maven mutli-project build and we've
been re-releasing quite a few tomcat versions using this technique.
On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Exactly. Since any change would require a learning curve
and it seems we don't have that many (read none) maven
experts in the house, Gradle could be equally considered,
given that it seems more advanced in customization.
I know well Maven but Olivier
> Exactly. Since any change would require a learning curve
> and it seems we don't have that many (read none) maven
> experts in the house, Gradle could be equally considered,
> given that it seems more advanced in customization.
I know well Maven but Olivier (Lamy) is a Maven expert, so there is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52360
--- Comment #2 from Peter Balogh 2011-12-19 17:55:59
UTC ---
I've tried to reproduce the issue without Eclipse, but I couldn't.
The only way I could make tomcat to reload my app was to change the autoDeploy
tag to true in the server.xml, s
On 12/19/2011 06:12 PM, Pid wrote:
On 18/12/2011 08:37, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
I simply cannot understand why some folks have
almost religious fascination with Maven.
I know many projects that have
On 18/12/2011 08:37, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
>>
>
> I simply cannot understand why some folks have
> almost religious fascination with Maven.
>
> I know many projects that have move from Ant to
> Mav
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52366
Bug #: 52366
Summary: Problem with the Loader Component documentation
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Seve
+1. But I'm no fan of maven to begin with.
-- Ian
- Reply message -
From: "Caldarale, Charles R"
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Subject: Move to Maven? (WAS: Re: Publishing process for JARs for Maven Central)
Date: Mon, Dec 19, 2011 09:41
I have to strongly agree with Mark here. Having
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52360
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365
Bug #: 52365
Summary: tomcat cluster
org.apache.catalina.tribes.ChannelException: Sender
not connected
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.32
Platform
2011/12/19 Caldarale, Charles R
> > From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:antonio.petre...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: Move to Maven? (WAS: Re: Publishing process for JARs for
> Maven Central)
>
> > > Switching to a single source tree was one of the
> > > best changes we ever made. It has been much easi
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 14:16, Antonio Petrelli
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb
>>
>>> On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli
>>> wrote:
>>> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>>> >
>>> >> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>> >> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
>>> >> > 1. Standa
On 19 December 2011 14:16, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb
>
>> On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli
>> wrote:
>> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>> >
>> >> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> >> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
>> >> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encour
> From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:antonio.petre...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Move to Maven? (WAS: Re: Publishing process for JARs for Maven
> Central)
> > Switching to a single source tree was one of the
> > best changes we ever made. It has been much easier
> > to manage than the multiple source
2011/12/19 sebb
> On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli
> wrote:
> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> >
> >> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
> >> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
> >> > structure. The source should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172292#comment-13172292
]
Brad Giaccio commented on MTOMCAT-108:
--
Reading plain text from a file wouldn't help
On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
>> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
>> > structure. The source should go into src/main/java, the resour
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172282#comment-13172282
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
I'm not in favor about adding such dependenc
On 18 December 2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/17/11 11:42 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>>
>>> On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> Ok then interprete my words as: n
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
Bug #: 52361
Summary: JasperException at JSP compilation
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.35
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: regres
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172247#comment-13172247
]
Morten Haraldsen commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
I use the plugin for building standa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52360
Bug #: 52360
Summary: Using NIO or APR, Comet requests after redeploy never
times out
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.35
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172166#comment-13172166
]
Hudson commented on MTOMCAT-109:
Integrated in TomcatMavenPlugin #74 (See
[https://build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172164#comment-13172164
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
I miss you here.
Do you need that for tomca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-109.
Resolution: Fixed
finally both have been implemented ;-)
a default value tru a mojo parameter (def
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 19 10:01:34 2011
New Revision: 1220675
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220675&view=rev
Log:
[MTOMCAT-109] nio protocol is impossible to use with tomcat exec mojo.
add an option in tomcat runner to override it tru cli
-httpProtocol
as it can be change on applicati
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 19 10:01:21 2011
New Revision: 1220674
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220674&view=rev
Log:
[MTOMCAT-109] nio protocol is impossible to use with tomcat exec mojo.
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven
> You see features where I see benefits of the features, asking the same
> question again and again shows your hate, and probably you hate me too,
> because I love Maven.
> No problem, you'll lose at some point :-D
Using Maven for Tomcat has been many times discussed here, each time
with a no go.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172118#comment-13172118
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-108:
--
why not reading the password from a file ?
This is exactly one thing I would like to avoid :-D
Antonio
2011/12/19
> Author: olamy
> Date: Mon Dec 19 08:50:05 2011
> New Revision: 1220657
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220657&view=rev
> Log:
> dependency on ClusterRuleSet has been removed and now really optionnal, no
> more n
Hello,
2011/12/18 jean-frederic clere :
> On 12/17/2011 07:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I am of the view "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". If there
>> was something we would gain by switching to Maven then I'd be interested
>> but given we have an established build process with Ant
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 19 08:50:05 2011
New Revision: 1220657
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220657&view=rev
Log:
dependency on ClusterRuleSet has been removed and now really optionnal, no more
need of this hack
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/maven/tomcat-catalina/pom.xml
Modif
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
> > structure. The source should go into src/main/java, the resources in
> > src/main/resources etc. You can change it, but t
2011/12/18 Mladen Turk
> On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>
>> As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
>>
>>
> I simply cannot understand why some folks have
> almost religious fascination with Maven.
>
In fact I feel as a Maven evangelist.
There is a thing that I like o
75 matches
Mail list logo
