Would it really hurt to keep those properties?
Le 1 sept. 2011 à 00:45, kkoli...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: kkolinko
> Date: Wed Aug 31 22:45:23 2011
> New Revision: 1163855
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163855&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert r1163807:
> Remove subclipse:tags property
I'm using subclipse which contains a 1.6 svn client. I'm not an svn expert,
I'll try to do as Mark recommends, I see the point of performing the merge
after so that svn can keep track of things.
Sylvain
Le 1 sept. 2011 à 00:34, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
> 2011/9/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 31/08
Le 31 août 2011 à 23:13, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 31/08/2011 21:38, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>> --- subclipse:tags (added)
>> +++ subclipse:tags Wed Aug 31 20:38:53 2011
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +932358,branches,/tomcat/tc7.0.x/branches,branch
>> +1162976,TOMCAT_7_0_21,/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOM
Le 31 août 2011 à 23:12, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 31/08/2011 21:37, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>> +
>
> You left out the (markt)
>
I thought it represented the person who finalized the release, so I left it out.
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +51744: Prevent application code from cl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51745
--- Comment #3 from d rogatkin 2011-09-01 01:15:24 UTC
---
I have checked with Android team, and it looks like Harmony bug was fixed for
Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), however still exists for earlier Androids. Perhaps
this problem can be clos
Author: kfujino
Date: Thu Sep 1 00:45:00 2011
New Revision: 1163879
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163879&view=rev
Log:
my vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=
Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Aug 31 22:45:23 2011
New Revision: 1163855
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163855&view=rev
Log:
Revert r1163807:
Remove subclipse:tags property.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/trunk/ (props changed)
Propchange: tomcat/tc7.0.x/
2011/9/1 Mark Thomas :
> On 31/08/2011 22:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2011/9/1 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 31/08/2011 21:35, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
Author: slaurent
Date: Wed Aug 31 20:35:22 2011
New Revision: 1163802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163802&view=rev
On 31/08/2011 22:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/9/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 31/08/2011 21:35, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: slaurent
>>> Date: Wed Aug 31 20:35:22 2011
>>> New Revision: 1163802
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163802&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fix https://issues
2011/9/1 Mark Thomas :
> On 31/08/2011 21:35, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: slaurent
>> Date: Wed Aug 31 20:35:22 2011
>> New Revision: 1163802
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163802&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
>> bug 51741:
On 31/08/2011 21:38, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: slaurent
> Date: Wed Aug 31 20:38:53 2011
> New Revision: 1163807
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163807&view=rev
> Log:
> bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with tc7,
> needs patch in tomcat
> htt
On 31/08/2011 21:37, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: slaurent
> Date: Wed Aug 31 20:37:38 2011
> New Revision: 1163804
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163804&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
> bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules witho
On 31/08/2011 21:35, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: slaurent
> Date: Wed Aug 31 20:35:22 2011
> New Revision: 1163802
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163802&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
> bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules witho
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
Sylvain Laurent changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: slaurent
Date: Wed Aug 31 20:38:53 2011
New Revision: 1163807
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163807&view=rev
Log:
bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with tc7,
needs patch in tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
Modified:
Author: slaurent
Date: Wed Aug 31 20:37:38 2011
New Revision: 1163804
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163804&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with tc7,
needs patch in tomcat
added se
Author: slaurent
Date: Wed Aug 31 20:35:22 2011
New Revision: 1163802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163802&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with tc7,
needs patch in tomcat
Modified
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51745
--- Comment #2 from d rogatkin 2011-08-31 18:16:32 UTC
---
I agree that the proposed solution is a workaround of the bug in connection
implementation. However it works for both mobile and desktop platforms
(validated) and can be consider l
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 31 17:46:22 2011
New Revision: 1163717
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163717&view=rev
Log:
As per the comment, remove the deprecated code
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilationContext.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 31 17:45:45 2011
New Revision: 1163716
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163716&view=rev
Log:
Revert r1163643
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilationContext.java
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilation
On 31/08/2011 18:39, Tim Funk wrote:
> /me confused - should this be removed from trunk instead of tc7.0.x?
Yes. Got my checkouts mixed up. I'll fix this shortly. Thanks for the catch.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
/me confused - should this be removed from trunk instead of tc7.0.x?
-Tim
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Aug 31 14:31:13 2011
> New Revision: 1163643
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163643&view=rev
> Log:
> As per the comment, remove the deprecat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #8 from Anjana Fernando 2011-08-31 15:57:33
UTC ---
Mark,
You could have used all those words to give me a simple explanation, I gave the
comments and reported the bug to my ability, I explained the issue as I
understood it, a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas 2011-08-31 15:37:20 UTC ---
I'll repeat: "You might also want to investigate when the JNDI context is
writeable."
I really do not appreciate code reviews based on guess work. If you are going
to comment on t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #6 from Anjana Fernando 2011-08-31 15:32:13
UTC ---
Hi Mark,
OK, sorry, I should have looked at the code before. I just didn't know where
the svn for this was (yeah it was a simple looking around the tomcat project
page), I th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51745
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2011-08-31 15:28:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 27447
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27447
Possible patch
I'm not a fan of adding workarounds in Tomcat for bugs in any third-party
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2011-08-31 14:48:59 UTC ---
Rather than guessing why don't you look at the source code and see what it
actually does? You might also want to investigate when the JNDI context is
writeable.
--
Configure bugm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #4 from Anjana Fernando 2011-08-31 14:43:14
UTC ---
Hi Mark,
Sorry, maybe I misunderstood, I guessed the modified version would be something
like the following,
public void close() throws NamingException {
if (checkWritea
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
--- Comment #2 from Irina Marudina 2011-08-31 14:38:52 UTC
---
It seems to be an issue in the java.beans.Introspector. I have produced a
simple test program and reported the bug to Oracle:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2011-08-31 14:35:00 UTC ---
No. The attempt to use the close() method will fail.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
--- Comment #2 from Anjana Fernando 2011-08-31 14:33:31
UTC ---
Hi Mark,
So for the situation I'm facing, in the close method, if the environment is
cleared, will this be removed from "ContextBindings" also? .. Since that was
the problem
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 31 14:31:13 2011
New Revision: 1163643
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163643&view=rev
Log:
As per the comment, remove the deprecated code
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspCompilationContext.java
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/o
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 31 14:20:17 2011
New Revision: 1163633
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163633&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
Don't allow user code to close the JNDI context while a web app is running
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 31 14:17:41 2011
New Revision: 1163630
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163630&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
Don't allow user code to close the JNDI context while a web app is running
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/or
On 29.08.2011 23:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.21 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.21/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_21/
>
> The prop
36 matches
Mail list logo
